Travertson Motorcycles V REX 2 vs Yamaha Super Tenere ES

Compare Specifications of Travertson Motorcycles V REX 2 and Yamaha Super Tenere ES

Selected Bikes

Travertson Motorcycles V REX 2
Travertson Motorcycles V REX 2

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha Super Tenere ES
Yamaha Super Tenere ES

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 1250.00 cc 1199.00 cc
Engine Genuine HD V-Rod Engine 120 HP Revolution liquid-cooled inline 2-cylinder; DOHC; 8 valves
Clutch -- wet clutch
Fuel System Electronic Sequential Port Fuel Injection (ESPFI) Fuel Injection with YCC-T
Ignition -- TCI: Transistor Controlled Ignition
Cooling System -- liquid-cooled
Maximum Torque 100 Nm @7000 Rpm --
Transmission -- 6-speed; multi-plate
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Frame Steel Tubing and Cast Aluminum --
Tyres
Front 130/70/18 Machined 18 x 4.25 Aluminum Assembly Hub / Rim 110/80R19
Rear 280/30/18 Slotted Machined 18 x 10.5 Aluminum 150/70R17
Wheel / RIM -- Spoke
Brakes
Front 6 piston inverted caliper / floating disk Dual 310mm hydraulic disc, Unified Brake System and ABS
Rear 2 piston caliper / floating disk 282mm single disc, Unified Brake System and ABS
Suspension
Front Aluminum twin swing arm and fully adjustable hydraulic mono shock 43mm inverted fork; electronically adjustable compression and rebound damping; 7.5-in travel
Rear Aluminum single sided swing arm and adjustable hydraulic dual shocks Monoshock; electronically adjustable preload and rebound damping; 7.5-in of travel
Colors Available
Colors -- Ceramic Ice


Physical Specs
Length -- 2255 mm
Width -- 980 mm
Height -- 1409 mm
Weight 304 kg 264 kg
Seat Height 660 845
Wheelbase 2011 mm 1539 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 18.2 litres 23 litres
Overview
Features Miles Per Gallon : 47.7 Highway/ 37.4 City for 5.2 liter - Electronic Suspension
- All-Purpose Drivetrain
- Crossplane Crankshaft Engine
- Adventure-Ready Motor
- Cruise Control
- D-Mode Throttle
- Luggage Ready
- Beefy Controls
- Standard Centerstand
Additional Details -- Final Drive : Shaft
Rake (Caster Angle) : 28.0°
Fuel Economy : 43 mpg

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1296