Yamaha 2022 Bolt R-spec vs Yamaha 2022 XSR900

Compare Specifications of Yamaha 2022 Bolt R-spec and Yamaha 2022 XSR900

Selected Bikes

Yamaha 2022 Bolt R-spec
Yamaha 2022 Bolt R-spec

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha 2022 XSR900
Yamaha 2022 XSR900

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 942.00 cc 890.00 cc
Engine Air-cooled SOHC V-twin; 4 valves Liquid-cooled DOHC inline 3-cylinder 4-stroke; 12 valves
Fuel System Fuel injection Yamaha Fuel Injection with YCC-T
Ignition TCI: Transistor Controlled Ignition TCI: Transistor Controlled Ignition
Transmission 5-speed; multiplate wet clutch 6-speed; multiplate assist-and-slipper wet clutch
Drivetrain Final Drive: Belt Final Drive: Chain
Display -- Full-Color 3.5-inch TFT Instrument Display
Tyres
Front 100/90-19 Bridgestone® EXEDRA G721 F 120/70ZR17 Bridgestone® Battlax Hypersport S22
Rear 150/80-16 Bridgestone® EXEDRA G722 R 180/55ZR17 Bridgestone® Battlax Hypersport S22
Brakes
Front Hydraulic single disc, 298mm 298mm dual hydraulic discs; ABS
Rear Hydraulic single disc, 298mm 245mm single hydraulic disc; ABS
Suspension
Front Telescopic fork, 4.7-in travel 41mm inverted fork, adjustable preload, compression and rebound; 5.1-in travel
Rear Dual piggyback shocks, 2.8-in travel Single shock, adjustable preload and rebound damping; 5.4-in travel
Colors Available
Colors Storm Gray Legend Blue
Raven


Physical Specs
Length 2291 mm 2153 mm
Width 944 mm 861 mm
Height 1120 mm 1155 mm
Seat Height 690 810
Wheelbase 1569 mm 1496 mm
Ground Clearance 129 mm 139 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 13 litres 14 litres
Overview
Features Low Seat Height
Powerful Braking
Unique Bolt Exhaust System
Tuned Triple Soundtrack
New Six-Axis IMU with Rider Aids
Cruise Control
Lean Sensitive Traction Control System
Slide Control System (SCS)
LIFT Control System (LIF)
Brake Control System (BC)
Advanced Ride-by-Wire Throttle with APSG
Advanced Up & Down Quick Shift Now Standard
Assist & Slipper (A&S) Clutch
Additional Details Fuel Economy: 51 mpg
Wet Weight: 542 lb
Rake (Caster Angle): 29.0°
Trail: 5.1 in
Rake (Caster Angle): 25.0°
Trail: 4.3 in
Wet Weight: 425 lb
Fuel Economy: 49 mpg

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1360