Yamaha 2022 TMAX vs Yamaha TMAX 530 SX

Compare Specifications of Yamaha 2022 TMAX and Yamaha TMAX 530 SX

Selected Bikes

Yamaha 2022 TMAX
Yamaha 2022 TMAX

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha TMAX 530 SX
Yamaha TMAX 530 SX

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 562.00 cc 530.00 cc
Engine Liquid-cooled, parallel 2-cylinder, EURO5, 4-stroke, 4 valves, DOHC Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke, DOHC, 4-valve
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Engine Lubrication Dry sump Dry Sump
Fuel System Petrol injection Fuel Injection
Ignition Transistor TCI
Cooling System Liquid-cooled Liquid Cooled
Maximum Power 47.6 PS 2 7500 RPM --
Maximum Torque 55.7 NM @ 5250 RPM --
Transmission V-belt automatic V-Belt Automatic
Display 7-inch TFT Color Display --
Frame -- Aluminium CF die-cast
Headlamp LED --
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front 120 / 70R15M / C 56H (tubeless) 120/70R15M/C 56H Tubeless
Rear 160 / 60R15M / C 67H (tubeless) 160/60R15M/C 67H Tubeless
Wheel / RIM Alloy Alloy
Brakes
Front 267 mm Hydraulic double disc brake, Hydraulic dual discs, 267 mm - ABS
Rear 267 mm Hydraulic disc brake Hydraulic single disc, 282 mm - ABS
Suspension
Front 120 mm Telescopic fork Telescopic forks, 120 mm travel
Rear 117 mm Swing arm Swingarm, 117 mm travel
Colors Available
Colors Extreme Yellow
Sword Grey
Icon Blue
--


Physical Specs
Length 2195 mm 2200 mm
Width 780 mm 765 mm
Height 1415 mm 1420 mm
Weight 218 kg 213 kg
Seat Height 800 --
Wheelbase 1575 mm 1575 mm
Ground Clearance 135 mm 125 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 15 litres 15 litres
Overview
Features - New, networked TFT color display, navigation system with complete map material-
- Powerful, EURO5-compliant engine
- New, sporty, dynamic fairing design
- New projector headlights, integrated indicators
- Improved ergonomics for the driver and front passenger
- Smart Key - keyless operation
- Light aluminum chassis
- Demanding, electronic control technology
- Generously dimensioned storage space
- Anti-theft main stand
--
Additional Details Fuel consumption: 4.8 L / 100 km
CO2 emission : 112 g / km
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

8727