Benelli TRK 251 E5 vs Kawasaki 2024 KLX 230R

Compare Specifications of Benelli TRK 251 E5 and Kawasaki 2024 KLX 230R

Selected Bikes

Benelli TRK 251 E5
Benelli TRK 251 E5

Brand:

Model:

Kawasaki 2024 KLX 230R
Kawasaki 2024 KLX 230R

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 249.00 cc 233.00 cc
Engine Single cylinder, 4 stroke, liquid cooled, 4 valves per cylinder, double overhead camshaft 4-stroke single, SOHC, air-cooled
Engine Starting Electric --
Engine Lubrication Wet sump forced --
Clutch In oil bath --
Fuel System Electronic injection with 37 mm throttle body DFI® with 32mm Keihin throttle body
Ignition -- TCBI Electronic Advance
Maximum Power 25.8 HP @ 9250 RPM --
Maximum Torque 21.1 NM @ 8000 RPM --
Transmission -- 6-speed, return shift with wet multi-disc manual clutch
Display LCD display --
Frame Trellis in steel tubes High-tensile steel, box-section perimeter
Tyres
Front 110/70 R17 80/100-21
Rear 150/60 R17 100/100-18
Wheel / RIM Front Rim:17 "x MT 3.50" DOT, In aluminum alloy
Rear Rim: 17 "x MT 4.50" DOT, In aluminum alloy
--
Brakes
Front Single floating disc ø280 mm with 4-piston caliper and ABS Single 240mm petal disc with a dual-piston caliper
Rear -- Single 220mm petal disc with single-piston caliper
Suspension
Front Upside-down fork with Ø 41 mm stanchions
Front Suspension Travel:135mm
37mm telescopic fork/9.8 in
Rear T Swingarm with central shock absorber
Rear Shock Travel:60mm
Uni-Trak® linkage system and single shock with adjustable spring preload/9.9 in
Colors Available
Colors -- Lime Green
Battle Gray


Physical Specs
Length 2070 mm 2044.7 mm
Width 840 mm 840.74 mm
Height 1300 mm 1198.88 mm
Weight 176 kg 115 kg
Seat Height 800 924.56
Wheelbase 1390 mm 1358.9 mm
Ground Clearance 170 mm 299.72 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 18 litres 6.4 litres
Overview
Features - BRAKING SYSTEM
- DIGITAL DISPLAY
- LARGE WINDSHIELD
--
Additional Details CO2 EMISSIONS : 75 g / Km
EXHAUST SYSTEM : With catalyzed system and lambda probe
APPROVAL: Euro 5
CONSUMPTION: 3.2 l / 100km
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

8244