Beta 390 RS Special Edition vs KTM 350 SX-F 2023

Compare Specifications of Beta 390 RS Special Edition and KTM 350 SX-F 2023

Selected Bikes

Beta 390 RS Special Edition
Beta 390 RS Special Edition

Brand:

Model:

KTM 350 SX-F 2023
KTM 350 SX-F 2023

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 385.60 cc 349.70 cc
Engine Single cylinder, 4 –stroke, liquid cooled, 4-valve (Titanium intake and exhaust), electric start. (back up kick starter as an option) 1-cylinder, 4-stroke engine
Engine Starting -- Electric starter
Engine Lubrication Twin Oil Pumps w/Cartridge Filter & Separate Compartments For Engine & Transmission --
Clutch Wet Diaphragm-style Wet multi-disc DS clutch, Brembo hydraulics
Fuel System 42mm Throttle Body w/ Dual Injectors --
Ignition Dual-Map Kokusan 200w output - On Demand Traction Control --
Seating Capacity -- 1
Transmission 6 Speed 5-speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5
Drivetrain -- Chain: X-Ring 5/8 x 1/4"
Frame Molybdenum steel / Double Cradle w/ quick air filter access Central double-cradle-type 25CrMo4 steel
Tyres
Front DOT Maxxis Enduro --
Rear DOT Maxxis Enduro --
Wheel / RIM -- Spokes
Brakes
Front 260 mm floating rotor Disc brake 260 mm
Rear 240 mm rotor Disc brake 220 mm
Suspension
Front 48 mm KYB AOS closed cartridge fork, adjustable compression & rebound WP XACT-USD, Ø 48 mm
Rear KYB 46mm body with adjustable rebound and high/low speed on compression adjustment WP XACT Monoshock with linkage
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Kerb Weight 107 101.9
Seat Height 939 958
Wheelbase 1490 mm --
Ground Clearance 320 mm 343 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 9 litres 7 litres
Overview
Features -- - Easy Suspension Adjustment
- Airbox
- Serviceability
- More Usable Power
- Launch Control & Quickshifter
- Selectable Maps + TC
- Absolute Control
- Ergonomics
- Performance
- Mass Centralization
- WP XACT Fork
- Stability
- Energy absorption
- Ground clearance
- Consistency
Additional Details -- EMS: Keihin EMS
Steering Head Angle: 63.9 °
Suspension Travel (Front): 310 Mm
Suspension Travel (Rear): 300 Mm

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

7856