Beta 500 RS Special Edition vs Fantic Caballero Flat Track 500

Compare Specifications of Beta 500 RS Special Edition and Fantic Caballero Flat Track 500

Selected Bikes

Beta 500 RS Special Edition
Beta 500 RS Special Edition

Brand:

Model:

Fantic Caballero Flat Track 500
Fantic Caballero Flat Track 500

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 477.50 cc 449.00 cc
Engine Single cylinder, 4 –stroke, liquid cooled, 4-valve (Titanium intake and exhaust), electric start. (back up kick starter as an option) Euro5 , Single cylinder 4 stroke, liquid cooled, Single camshaft - 4 valve
Engine Starting -- Electric
Engine Lubrication Twin Oil Pumps w/Cartridge Filter & Separate Compartments For Engine & Transmission --
Clutch Wet Diaphragm-style Multi plate wet clutch
Fuel System 42mm Throttle Body w/ Dual Injectors Electronic Fuel - throttle body ø 40mm
Ignition Dual-Map Kokusan 200w output - On Demand Traction Control --
Cooling System -- Liquid cooled
Maximum Power -- 39.5 HP @ 7100 RPM
Maximum Torque -- 43 NM @ 6000 RPM
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Frame Molybdenum steel / Double
Cradle w/ quick air filter
access
CrMo steel central-tube frame
Tyres
Front DOT Maxxis Enduro 130/80-19
Rear DOT Maxxis Enduro 140/80-19
Wheel / RIM -- Spoked with aluminum rims
Brakes
Front 260 mm floating rotor Floating brake disc 320mm
Rear 240 mm rotor disc brake 230mm
ABS -- Continental two-channel ABS (disengageable)
Suspension
Front 48 mm KYB AOS closed cartridge fork, adjustable compression & rebound 41mm upside down
Front suspension travel: 150mm
Rear KYB 46mm body with adjustable rebound and high/low speed on compression adjustment Rebound damping regulation
Rear suspension travel: 150mm
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length -- 2120 mm
Weight 108 kg 150 kg
Seat Height 37 840
Wheelbase 1490 mm 1425 mm
Ground Clearance 320 mm --
Fuel Tank Capacity 9 litres 12 litres
Overview
Features -- --
Additional Details -- Exhaust system: Dual exhaust by ARRO
Fuel consumption: 4,2 l/100 km
CO2 emission: 97 g/km
Swingarm: In steel with variable section and progressive link

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1636