Beta ekinder Race 16 vs IDEAL Orama E605N Wave

Compare Specifications of Beta ekinder Race 16 and IDEAL Orama E605N Wave

Selected Bikes

Beta ekinder Race 16
Beta ekinder Race 16

Brand:

Model:

IDEAL Orama E605N Wave
IDEAL Orama E605N Wave

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Electric Electric
Motor 36V500W Brushless motor+ Sine wave controller --
Load Carrying Capacity 70 Kg --
Drivetrain -- Shimano DU-E6100 STEPS, 60Nm, sportive
Top Speed 29 kmph --
Battery 36V 5AH, removable high-power lithium battery Shimano BT-E8010, 504Wh (14Ah)
Charger 42V*3A --
Display -- Shimano SC-E6100 STEPS
Frame Aluminum alloy e-CITY Semi-Integrated, AL6061-T4/T6
Stem -- Ergotec Octopus Ahead 50, 31.8 mm, 90 mm
Handle Bar Alloy Ergotec Ladytown, 620 mm
Fork Suspension fork, adjustable, travel 40mm RST Volant-T, 60 mm, adjustable preload
Seatpost -- Ergotec Atar, 31.6 mm
Grip APOLLO SOFTER grip --
Crankset -- Shimano STEPS FC-E6100/ SM-CRE61, 38T
Chain -- Shimano (CN-HG71)
Shifters -- Shimano STEPS (SW-E7000-L) / Shimano Nexus (SL-C7000-5)
Saddle -- Selle Royal Premium Essenza D
Hub Front Normal type, without bearing Shimano (HB-TX500-QR)
Hub Rear -- Shimano Nexus-5 (SG-C7000-5D)
Cassette -- Shimano, 27T (CS-C7000)
Stand -- Atran REX-HV rear kickstand
Headlamp -- Herrmans H-Black MR4, 40Lux/AXA Blue Line 2LED
Tyres
Front 16“*2.5 Schwalbe Energizer Active Plus PunctureGuard, Reflex, 47-622
Rear 16“*2.5 Schwalbe Energizer Active Plus PunctureGuard, Reflex, 47-622
Wheel / RIM Alloy spoked rim Mach1 Traxx 640 Disc, 21C-622
Brakes
Front mechanical disc brake Shimano BR-MT200/BL-MT201, 180 mm
Rear mechanical disc brake Shimano BR-MT200/BL-MT201, 180 mm
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Overview
Features -- --
Additional Details -- Size : 46/50/54 cm
Power Adapter : Shimano, 2A (EC-E6002-1)
Chain Protector : Herrmans Halo
Mudguards : SKS PET, 56 mm
Carrier : Standwell, Aluminium Semi-Integrated, CarryMore II System

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

2509