Bianchi Volpe Sora 9sp vs Trek Madone SLR 9 Gen 7

Compare Specifications of Bianchi Volpe Sora 9sp and Trek Madone SLR 9 Gen 7

Selected Bikes

Bianchi Volpe Sora 9sp
Bianchi Volpe Sora 9sp

Brand:

Model:

Trek Madone SLR 9 Gen 7
Trek Madone SLR 9 Gen 7

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Load Carrying Capacity -- 125 kg (275 lb)
Battery -- Shimano BT-DN300
Charger -- Charging cable included
Frame BIANCHI STEEL FRAME TIG WELDED, BUTTED CR-MO MAIN TUBES WITH PG CR-MO REAR STAYS, SIZES: 46-49-51-53-55-57-59-61CM 800 Series OCLV Carbon, KVF (Kammtail Virtual Foil) tube shape, IsoFlow seat tube, invisible cable routing, 3S aero chain keeper, T47 BB, flat mount disc, 142x12 mm thru axle
Stem 3D FORGED ALLOY, 7°, DIAM 31.8MM, EXT: 80MM-46/51CM, 90MM-53/55CM, 110MM-57-59CM, 120MM-61CM --
Handle Bar AL6061 DB, FLAT TOP, DIAM 31.6MM, SIZE: 400MM-46/51CM, 420MM-53/57CM, 440MM-59/61CM Size: 47
Madone Integrated handlebar/stem, OCLV Carbon, 80 mm reach, 124 mm drop, 35 cm control width, 38 cm drop width, 80 mm stem length
Size: 50, 52
Madone Integrated handlebar/stem, OCLV Carbon, 80 mm reach, 124 mm drop, 37 cm control width, 40 cm drop width, 90 mm stem length
Size: 54
Madone Integrated handlebar/stem, OCLV Carbon, 80 mm reach, 124 mm drop, 39 cm control width, 42 cm drop width, 90 mm stem length
Size: 56, 58
Madone Integrated handlebar/stem, OCLV Carbon, 80 mm reach,
Fork BIANCHI CR-MO, 1-1/8" Madone KVF full carbon, tapered carbon steerer, internal brake routing, flat mount disc, carbon dropouts, 12x100mm thru axle
Seatpost AL2014 SHAFT, ALLOY HEAD, 12 MM OFFSET, DIAM. 27.2 MM, LENGTH: 350MM Size: 47, 50, 52, 54
Madone aero carbon seat post, 0 mm offset, short length
Size: 56, 58, 60, 62
Madone aero carbon seat post, 0 mm offset, long length
Grip CORK W/BIANCHI LOGO Bontrager Supertack Perf tape
Crankset SHIMANO FC-R345-L 50X34T, CRANK LENGTH: 170MM-46/57CM, 175MM-59/61CM Size: 47
Shimano Dura-Ace R9200, 52/36, 165 mm length
Size: 50, 52
Shimano Dura-Ace R9200, 52/36, 170 mm length
Size: 54, 56, 58
Shimano Dura-Ace R9200, 52/36, 172.5 mm length
Size: 60, 62
Shimano Dura-Ace R9200, 52/36, 175 mm length
Chain SHIMANO CN-HG53 9SP Shimano Dura-Ace/XTR M9100, 12-speed
Shifters SHIMANO SORA ST-R3000 2X9SP Shimano Dura-Ace R9270 Di2, 12 speed
Saddle WTB SPEED V SPORT SE, STEEL RAIL Size: 47, 50, 52
Aeolus RSL, carbon rails, 155 mm width
Size: 54, 56, 58, 60, 62
Aeolus RSL, carbon rails, 145 mm width
Headset VP-A51AE, 1.1/8" --
Derailleur Front SHIMANO SORA FD-R3000 Shimano Dura-Ace R9250 Di2, braze-on, down swing
Derailleur Rear SHIMANO SORA RD-R3000 GS 9SP Shimano Dura-Ace R9250 Di2, 34T max cog
Hub Front FORMULA RB-51 --
Hub Rear FORMULA RB-52 --
Cassette -- Shimano Dura-Ace R9200, 11-30, 12-speed
Chainrings -- 1x: 50T, 2x: 54/40
Sprocket SHIMANO CS-HG400-9, 11-13-15-17-20-23-26-30-34T --
Bottom Bracket -- Praxis, T47 threaded, internal bearing
Tyres
Front KENDA KWICK TENDRIL 700X35C Bontrager R4 320, 700x25 mm
Rear KENDA KWICK TENDRIL 700X35C Bontrager R4 320, 700x25 mm
Wheel / RIM REPARTO CORSE ATD470 F: Bontrager Aeolus RSL 51, OCLV Carbon, Tubeless Ready, 51 mm rim depth, 100x12 mm thru axle
R: Bontrager Aeolus RSL 51, OCLV Carbon, Tubeless Ready, 51 mm rim depth, Shimano 11/12 freehub, 142x12 mm thru axle
Brakes
Front TEKTRO CR720 CANTILEVER Shimano Dura-Ace hydraulic disc

Rotors
Shimano MT900, CentreLock, 160 mm (Size: 47, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60, 62)
Shimano CL900, CentreLock, 160 mm (Size: 47, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60, 62)
Rear -- Shimano Dura-Ace hydraulic disc

Rotors
Shimano MT900, CentreLock, 160 mm (Size: 47, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60, 62)
Shimano CL900, CentreLock, 160 mm (Size: 47, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60, 62)
Brake Lever INCLUDED W/SHIFTERS --
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors Blue Deep Smoke
Azure
Satin Quicksilver
Axinite Flip/Trek Black
Viper Red
Metallic Red Smoke to Red Carbon Smoke


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight -- 7.1 kg
Overview
Features -- --
Additional Details SIZES : 500 510 530 550 570 590 610 46
BB : SHIMANO BB-ES300
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

3814