Boom Moto EMB I300 vs Cleveland Cyclewerks Falcon BLK

Compare Specifications of Boom Moto EMB I300 and Cleveland Cyclewerks Falcon BLK

Selected Bikes

Boom Moto EMB I300
Boom Moto EMB I300

Brand:

Model:

Cleveland Cyclewerks Falcon BLK
Cleveland Cyclewerks Falcon BLK

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Electric Electric
Motor 10 kW hub motor Motenergy air-cooled radial flux, 13kWh (peak)
Range 120 Miles 50 miles / 100 miles (Power mode)
Charging Time > 8 HOURS 45 minutes (80% charged)
1 hour / 30 minutes (100% charged)
Cooling System -- Air-cooled radial flux
Maximum Power -- 18 Ps
Maximum Torque -- 39 Nm
Load Carrying Capacity 300 LBS --
Transmission -- Clutchless, direct drive
Top Speed 136 + kmph 136 kmph
Battery 100 amp hr battery 48.8 volts, Samsung 2.3kWh (1 cell) / 4.6kWh (2 cells)
Charger Level 1 (84V) charging port Integrated IP65 . 110/240
Frame -- 6061 aluminum, extruded, forged, and CNC jointed and welded
Headlamp LED --
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front 17 inch vacuum tires Michelin Pilot Street 80/90-17
Rear 17 inch vacuum tires Michelin Pilot Street 100/80-17
Wheel / RIM Alloy Cast aluminum
Front wheel : 1.85 x 17
Rear wheel : 2.15 x 17
Brakes
Front Dual disc Card dual opposed piston , 100 mm Master , Composite brake lines 200 mm Rotor
Rear Disc Card dual opposed piston , 100 mm Master , Composite brake lines 200 mm Rotor
Suspension
Front -- Inverted non adjustable
Travel : 120 mm
Rear -- Piggyback / Air Bladder
Travel : 100 mm
Colors Available
Colors Green
Metallic Grey
Green over Grey
--


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight -- 170 kg
Kerb Weight -- 79
Seat Height -- 762
Wheelbase -- 1223 mm
Overview
About The Boom Moto EMB I300 is a breakthrough in the world of electric motorcycles, effortlessly ble Read More --
Features -- - LCD display
- Smartphone connectivity via Bluetooth
- Braking system
Additional Details -- Trail : 109 mm
Power Pack : Angry Pixy Power X2
Capacity : 4.4 KWh
Controller : High efficiency and power dense , 300 Amp , 3-phase AC controller and with regenerative deceleration

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

679