Buell 2022 Hammerhead 1190 vs Indian Scout Bobber 2025

Compare Specifications of Buell 2022 Hammerhead 1190 and Indian Scout Bobber 2025

Selected Bikes

Buell 2022 Hammerhead 1190
Buell 2022 Hammerhead 1190

Brand:

Model:

Indian Scout Bobber 2025
Indian Scout Bobber 2025

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 1190.00 cc 1250.00 cc
Engine ET-V2: 72° V-Twin, Liquid Cooled, Four-stroke Liquid Cooled V-Twin (60 degrees)
Engine Starting Electric --
Clutch Hydraulic actuation, vacuum operated slipper Wet, Multi-Plate
Fuel System Electronic Fuel injection with 2 port injectors & 2 showerhead injectors Closed loop fuel injection / 63 mm bore
Cooling System Liquid Cooled --
Maximum Power 185 PS @ 10,600 RPM 105 Hp
Maximum Torque 137.8 Nm @ 8200 RPM 111.2 Nm
Load Carrying Capacity 375 lbs (170kg) --
Transmission Transmission Ratios:
1st 2.46
2nd 1.75
3rd 1.38
4th 1.17
5th 1.04
6th 0.96
2.276:1
Drivetrain Primary Drive : Gear Drive 36/65
Final Drive ; 520 Z-ring chain, 16/41
--
Frame Aluminum frame with integral fuel reservoir --
Headlamp -- LED
Taillamp -- LED
Tyres
Front -- Pirelli MT60RS 130/90B16 67H
Rear -- Pirelli MT60RS 150/80B16 77H
Wheel / RIM Front Wheel: 17 x 3.5 Aluminum
Rear Wheel: 17 x 6.0 Aluminum
Cast 8-Spoke 16" x 3.5"
Brakes
Front 386mm (15.19in.) Single perimeter rotor, 8 piston inside-out caliper Single / 298 mm Semi-Floating Rotor / 2 Piston Caliper
Rear 220mm (8.66in.) Disc, 2-piston Hayes Performance Brakes Caliper Single / 298 mm Semi-Floating Rotor / 1 Piston Caliper
Suspension
Front Showa, inverted big piston front forks Telescopic Fork
Rear Showa, single shock without linkage Dual Shocks
Colors Available
Colors -- Black Metallic


Physical Specs
Length 2040 mm 2206 mm
Width 737 mm 930 mm
Height 1110 mm 1071 mm
Weight 190 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 237
Seat Height 826 649
Wheelbase -- 1562 mm
Ground Clearance 120 mm 109 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity -- 13 litres
Overview
Features -- --
Additional Details Exhaust : Primary + Secondary
Swingarm : Optimized stiffness aluminum
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

8976