Cannondale CAAD Optimo 3 vs Kross Hexagon 6.0

Compare Specifications of Cannondale CAAD Optimo 3 and Kross Hexagon 6.0

Selected Bikes

Cannondale CAAD Optimo 3
Cannondale CAAD Optimo 3

Brand:

Model:

Kross Hexagon 6.0
Kross Hexagon 6.0

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Speed -- 24
Frame SmartForm C2 Alloy, SAVE, tapered headtube, fender mounts, 130x10mm QR --
Stem 6061 Alloy, 31.8, 7 degree ALUMINIUM/31,8/ 7°/ (XS- 75 MM, S- 75 MM, M- 90 MM, L- 105 MM, XL- 105 MM)
Handle Bar 6061 Alloy, Compact ALUMINIUM 680 MM 31.8
Fork CAAD Optimo Full Carbon, 1-1/8" to 1-1/4" steerer, fender mounts, 100x9mm QR SR SUNTOUR XCM RL
Seatpost Cannondale 4, 6061 Alloy, 27.2x350mm --
Grip Cannondale Bar Tape, 3.5mm KROSS SCALE
Crankset FSA Vero Alloy, 50/34 SHIMANO TY301
Pedals -- PLASTIC / STEEL
Chain KMC X9, 9-speed YBN S8
Shifters Shimano Sora, 9-speed SHIMANO ST-EF505
Saddle Cannondale Stage CX KROSS
Headset CAAD Optimo, 1-1/8" to 1-1/4", 25mm top cap 1-1/8"
Derailleur Front Shimano Sora, 31.8 clamp SHIMANO TOURNEY TY700
Derailleur Rear Shimano Sora GS SHIMANO ACERA M360
Hub Front Formula RB-31 GL-B43R-DS
Hub Rear Formula RB-32 GL-B43F-DS
Spoke Stainless Steel, 14g --
Cassette Shimano HG50, 11-30, 9-speed SHIMANO HG200
Chainrings -- 42T-34T-24T / 175 MM
Bottom Bracket Cartridge, square taper BSA 68 MM
Tyres
Front Vittoria Zaffiro, 700x25c MITAS OCELOT V85 29 X 2.1
Rear Vittoria Zaffiro, 700x25c MITAS OCELOT V85 29 X 2.1
Wheel / RIM RS 3.0, 24h front, 28h rear KROSS
Brakes
Front Promax RC-452, dual pivot calipers SHIMANO MT200
Rear Promax RC-452, dual pivot calipers SHIMANO MT200
Brake Lever Shimano Sora SHIMANO EF505
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors Black Black / Graphite / Red Matte


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight -- 13.78 kg
Overview
Features -- --
Additional Details -- Travel : 100 MM
Rear Shock : Lack
Rear Shock Absorber Travel : Lack
Freewheel Range : 12-32T
Saddle Bracket : Aluminium/ (XS- 27,2 X 300 MM, S- 27,2 X 300 MM, M- 27,2 X 350 MM, L- 27,2 X 350 MM, XL- 27,2 X 350 MM)

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

5354