CFMoto 300 SS vs Kawasaki Versys X 300 Urban

Compare Specifications of CFMoto 300 SS and Kawasaki Versys X 300 Urban

Selected Bikes

CFMoto 300 SS
CFMoto 300 SS

Brand:

Model:

Kawasaki Versys X 300 Urban
Kawasaki Versys X 300 Urban

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 292.00 cc 296.00 cc
Engine Single-cylinder, liquid-cooled, DOHC, 4 valves Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke Parallel Twin,DOHC, 8 valves
Engine Starting -- Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Forced lubrication, wet sump
Clutch -- Wet multi-disc, manual
Fuel System Bosch® EFI Fuel injection: Ø 32 mm x 2 with dual throttle valves
Cooling System -- Liquid-cooled
Maximum Power 29 hp @ 8,750 rpm 40 PS @ 11500 RPM
Maximum Torque 25.3 N-m @ 7,250 rpm 25.7 NM @ 10000 RPM
Transmission 6-speed, wet, multi-plate, CF-SC slipper clutch 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Display 5" TFT display --
Headlamp LED --
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front 110/70 R17 100/90-19M/C 57S
Rear 140/60 R17 130/80-17M/C 65S
Wheel / RIM 3 x 17/3.5 x 17 MT Aluminum alloy Spoke
Brakes
Front 292 mm single disc, 4-piston caliper Single 290 mm petal disc. Caliper: Single balanced actuation dual piston
Rear 220 mm single disc, single-piston floating caliper Single 220 mm petal disc. Caliper: Dual piston
ABS Continental ABS, dual-channel --
Suspension
Front Upside down telescopic fork, hydraulic damping 41 mm telescopic fork
Rear Mono suspension, center aligned Bottom-Link Uni-Trak, gas-charged shock and adjustable preload
Colors Available
Colors Ghost Grey
Nebula Black
Metallic Spark Black
Candy Lime Green


Physical Specs
Length 2,010 mm 2170 mm
Width 750 mm 860 mm
Height 1,080 mm 1390 mm
Kerb Weight 165 175
Seat Height 780 --
Wheelbase 1,360 mm 1450 mm
Ground Clearance -- 180 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 12 litres 17 litres
Overview
Features -- - Topcase System 30 Litres
Additional Details -- Final drive : Sealed chain
Primary Reduction Ratio : 3.087 (71/23)
Gear Ratios 1st : 2.714 (38/14)
Gear Ratios 2nd : 1.789 (34/19)
Gear Ratios 3rd : 1.409 (31/22)
Gear Ratios 4th : 1.160 (29/25)
Gear Ratios 5th : 1.000 (27/27)
Gear Ratios 6th : 0.857 (24/28)
Final reduction ratio : 3.286 (46/14)
Fuel consumption : 4.1 l/100 km
CO2 emission : 103 g/km
Trail : 108 mm
Wheel travel front : 130 mm
Wheel travel rear : 148 mm

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

8302