CFMoto Cforce 625 vs TGB Blade 600 SE.X EPS

Compare Specifications of CFMoto Cforce 625 and TGB Blade 600 SE.X EPS

Selected Bikes

CFMoto Cforce 625
CFMoto Cforce 625

Brand:

Model:

TGB Blade 600 SE.X EPS
TGB Blade 600 SE.X EPS

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 580.00 cc 561.00 cc
Engine Singer cylinder, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valve Single Cylinder, SOHC
Engine Starting Electric --
Fuel System EFI 42 mm Throttle Body /EFI
Ignition ECU --
Cooling System Liquid cooled Liquid cooled
Maximum Power 40 HP @ 6750 RPM 44.79014 Hp / 6500 rpm
Maximum Torque 49 NM @ 5250 RPM 46.5 Nm / 5500 rpm
Transmission CVT V-belt CVT Automatic
Drivetrain Drive : 2WD/4WD/Front differential lock --
Display LCD Digital Display
Headlamp LED --
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front AT 25×8.0-12 AT 25 × 8 - 12 Kenda Big Horn
Rear AT 25×10.00-12 AT 25 × 10 - 12 Kenda Big Horn
Wheel / RIM Front:12×6.0, cast aluminum
Rear:12×7.5, cast aluminum
Matt black, 8-spoke, 12" Aluminium
Brakes
Front Front wheel hydraulic disc +
rear wheel central axle brake
180 mm ventilated discs
Rear -- 200 mm ventilated discs
Suspension
Front Double A-arm, independent suspension Double A-Arm with 22cm Travel
Rear Double A-arm, independent suspension Double A-Arm with 24cm Travel & Anti-roll bar
Colors Available
Colors Lava Orange
Pearl Injected Blue
Titanium Grey
True timber Camo
Mountain Gray


Physical Specs
Length 2035 mm 2120 mm
Width 1180 mm 1240 mm
Height 1220 mm 1280 mm
Weight 230 kg 437 kg
Kerb Weight 395 --
Seat Height 530 950
Wheelbase 1280 mm 1290 mm
Ground Clearance 270 mm 320 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 18 litres 18 litres
Overview
About -- The TGB Blade 600 SE.X EPS is an all-terrain vehicle (ATV) notable for its 561 cc single-cylind Read More
Features - LCD screen
- LED Lights
- Split Seat
- Rider protection
- Independent Suspension
- Electronic Power Steering
- 4-Wheel Disc Brakes
--
Additional Details Shock Absorber : Front/Rear: Coil spring + oil damping, preload adjustable
Rim : Front:12×6.0, cast aluminum
Rear:12×7.5, cast aluminum
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1869