Co-Motion Macchiato vs Trek Madone SLR 9 Gen 7

Compare Specifications of Co-Motion Macchiato and Trek Madone SLR 9 Gen 7

Selected Bikes

Co-Motion Macchiato
Co-Motion Macchiato

Brand:

Model:

Trek Madone SLR 9 Gen 7
Trek Madone SLR 9 Gen 7

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Load Carrying Capacity -- 125 kg (275 lb)
Battery -- Shimano BT-DN300
Charger -- Charging cable included
Frame Co-Motion exclusive ACMUltra7 7005 aluminum zonally-butted tandem tubing 800 Series OCLV Carbon, KVF (Kammtail Virtual Foil) tube shape, IsoFlow seat tube, invisible cable routing, 3S aero chain keeper, T47 BB, flat mount disc, 142x12 mm thru axle
Stem FSA SL-K stem & Co-Motion stoker stem --
Handle Bar -- Size: 47
Madone Integrated handlebar/stem, OCLV Carbon, 80 mm reach, 124 mm drop, 35 cm control width, 38 cm drop width, 80 mm stem length
Size: 50, 52
Madone Integrated handlebar/stem, OCLV Carbon, 80 mm reach, 124 mm drop, 37 cm control width, 40 cm drop width, 90 mm stem length
Size: 54
Madone Integrated handlebar/stem, OCLV Carbon, 80 mm reach, 124 mm drop, 39 cm control width, 42 cm drop width, 90 mm stem length
Size: 56, 58
Madone Integrated handlebar/stem, OCLV Carbon, 80 mm reach,
Fork Co-Motion Tandem Elite Disc Madone KVF full carbon, tapered carbon steerer, internal brake routing, flat mount disc, carbon dropouts, 12x100mm thru axle
Seatpost -- Size: 47, 50, 52, 54
Madone aero carbon seat post, 0 mm offset, short length
Size: 56, 58, 60, 62
Madone aero carbon seat post, 0 mm offset, long length
Grip -- Bontrager Supertack Perf tape
Crankset -- Size: 47
Shimano Dura-Ace R9200, 52/36, 165 mm length
Size: 50, 52
Shimano Dura-Ace R9200, 52/36, 170 mm length
Size: 54, 56, 58
Shimano Dura-Ace R9200, 52/36, 172.5 mm length
Size: 60, 62
Shimano Dura-Ace R9200, 52/36, 175 mm length
Chain -- Shimano Dura-Ace/XTR M9100, 12-speed
Shifters Shimano Ultegra R8000 2x11-speed Shimano Dura-Ace R9270 Di2, 12 speed
Saddle Selle Italia SLS saddles Size: 47, 50, 52
Aeolus RSL, carbon rails, 155 mm width
Size: 54, 56, 58, 60, 62
Aeolus RSL, carbon rails, 145 mm width
Headset Cane Creek 110 Tapered --
Derailleur Front Shimano Ultegra R8000 2x11-speed Shimano Dura-Ace R9250 Di2, braze-on, down swing
Derailleur Rear Shimano Ultegra R8000 2x11-speed Shimano Dura-Ace R9250 Di2, 34T max cog
Cassette Shimano 11-34t cassette Shimano Dura-Ace R9200, 11-30, 12-speed
Chainrings -- 1x: 50T, 2x: 54/40
Bottom Bracket -- Praxis, T47 threaded, internal bearing
Tyres
Front Conti Grand Prix 4000S 700 x 25 Bontrager R4 320, 700x25 mm
Rear Conti Grand Prix 4000S 700 x 25 Bontrager R4 320, 700x25 mm
Wheel / RIM Rolf Prima Tandem Alloy F: Bontrager Aeolus RSL 51, OCLV Carbon, Tubeless Ready, 51 mm rim depth, 100x12 mm thru axle
R: Bontrager Aeolus RSL 51, OCLV Carbon, Tubeless Ready, 51 mm rim depth, Shimano 11/12 freehub, 142x12 mm thru axle
Brakes
Front TRP Spyre w/ 180 mm disc rotors Shimano Dura-Ace hydraulic disc

Rotors
Shimano MT900, CentreLock, 160 mm (Size: 47, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60, 62)
Shimano CL900, CentreLock, 160 mm (Size: 47, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60, 62)
Rear TRP Spyre w/ 180 mm disc rotors Shimano Dura-Ace hydraulic disc

Rotors
Shimano MT900, CentreLock, 160 mm (Size: 47, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60, 62)
Shimano CL900, CentreLock, 160 mm (Size: 47, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60, 62)
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors -- Deep Smoke
Azure
Satin Quicksilver
Axinite Flip/Trek Black
Viper Red
Metallic Red Smoke to Red Carbon Smoke


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight -- 7.1 kg
Overview
Features - Modern derailleur drive trains are lightweight, smooth operating and very efficient
- Ultegra R8000 is the newest iteration of Shimano's most popular road component group
- Compact 50/34t cranks and wide road cassette offers a generous gear range
- Shimano Ultegra R8000 kit offers a 26.4" low, 119.9" high gear
--
Additional Details Drivetrain : FSA SL-K Modular BB392Evo carbon 50-34t / Gates Timing Belt
Cockpit : Profile Canta Ergo carbon captain,Profile Viper carbon stoker bar
Post : FSA K-Force Carbon 31.6 mm
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

3824