Energica Experia vs Zero SR/S 2024

Compare Specifications of Energica Experia and Zero SR/S 2024

Selected Bikes

Energica Experia
Energica Experia

Brand:

Model:

Zero SR/S 2024
Zero SR/S 2024

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Electric Electric
Motor Permanent Magnet Assisted Synchronous Reluctance Motor (PMA SynRM)
DC Voltage: 306V nominal
Z-Force 75-10 enhanced thermal efficiency, passively air-cooled, interior permanent magnet AC motor
Range City: 420 km (261 miles)
Combined: 256 km (160 miles)
Extra-Urban: 208 km (130 miles)
WMTC: 222 km (138 miles)
City: - 171 miles (275 km)
High-Speed Highway Commuting: - 116 miles (187 km)
Charging Time -- (110 V): - 11.6 hours (100% charged) / 11.1 hours (95% charged)
(standard): - 2.7 hours (100% charged) / 2.2 hours (95% charged)
6 kW Rapid Charger - 1.6 hours (100% charged) / 1.1 hours (95% charged)
Engine Starting Electric --
Maximum Power Continuous: 60kW/ 80 PS @ 7000 RPM
Peak: 75kW/102 PS @ 7500 RPM
113 hp
Maximum Torque 115 Nm / 85 ft lb. – 900 Nm / 664 ft lb. at wheel 190 Nm
Load Carrying Capacity -- 219 Kg
Transmission -- Clutchless direct drive
Top Speed 180 kmph 200 kmph
Riding Modes 7 Profiles: Energica 1-4 (factory preset), Custom 1-3 (Customizable)
4 Riding Modes: Eco, Urban, Rain, Sport
4 Regenerative Modes: High, Medium, Low, Off
--
Battery Max. 22.5 kWh / Nominal 19.6 kWh – lithium polymer
LIFE: 1200 Cycles @ 80% Capacity (100% DOD) RECHARGE
Fast Charge : DCFC Level 3 Mode 4: 400 km/h o 6,7 km/min (248 miles/h o 4 miles/min)
Slow Charge : Level 2 Mode 2 or 3: 63,5 km/h (39,5 miles/h)
--
Charger Onboard, 3kW 90-264Vac 50/60Hz [1kW 90-177Vac range]. Conforms to Standards SAE J1772 and IEC 62196-2 with pilot signal for charging station interface 6.6kW integrated
Controller Dual Microcontroller ARM Based High efficiency and power dense, 900 Amp, 3-phase AC controller with regenerative deceleration
Display 5” IPS 1000 nits bonded 848×480 TFT Color Display --
Chain Regina, (16/52) 520 O-Ring Chain --
Tyres
Front Pirelli Scorpion Trail II 120/70-17 Ant Pirelli Diablo Rosso III 120/70-17
Rear Pirelli Scorpion Trail II 180/55-17 Post Pirelli Diablo Rosso III 180/55-17
Wheel / RIM Cast Aluminum: front 3.5” x 17” / rear 5.5” x 17” Front - 3.50 x 17
Rear - 5.50 x 17
Brakes
Front Brembo, Double Floating Discs, Ø330 mm, 4 Pistons Radial Caliper Bosch Advanced MSC, dual J-Juan radial 4-piston calipers with radial master cylinder, 320 x 5 mm discs
Rear Brembo, Single Disc, Ø240 mm, 2 Pistons Caliper Bosch Advanced MSC, J-Juan single piston floating caliper, 240 x 4.5 mm disc
ABS Cornering Bosch 9.3 MP --
Suspension
Front ZF Sachs – Ø43 mm, 150mm travel, adjustable preload, extension and compression Showa 43 mm Big Piston Separate Function forks, with adjustable spring preload, compression and rebound damping
Rear ZF Sachs – 55mm travel, 150mm wheel travel, adjustable extension and preload Showa 40 mm piston, piggy-back reservoir shock with adjustable spring preload, compression and rebound damping
Colors Available
Colors Bormio Ice Thermal / Black
Asphalt - Cyan


Physical Specs
Length 2132 mm --
Width 867 mm --
Height 1461 mm --
Weight 260 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 235
Seat Height 847 787
Wheelbase 1513 mm 1450 mm
Overview
Features - Heated hand grips
- Cast aluminum wheels with red details
- Bar ends & Ergal bolts kit Black
- New High-Tech platform.
- Side bags
- Top case
- New motor and battery
- Enjoys the largest battery capacity of any electric motorcycle
--
Additional Details TRACTION CONTROL : Six levels of intervention combined with the existing eABS and the Cornering Bosch 9.3 MP
CRUISE CONTROL : Cruise control system that uses the electronic brake to maintain speed and increase braking energy
PARK ASSISTANT : Forward and Reverse (Slow speed)
LPR FUNCTION : Long Period Rest: allows the maintenance and automatic balancing of the batteries during long period of non-use
CHARGE INTERRUPTION : AC and DC up to requested State Of Charge, AC and DC CCS charge completion with balancing, CHAdeMO 95% (depending on environmental conditions).
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

4957