Felt Doctrine 5 NX Eagle 2019

Compare Specifications of Felt Doctrine 5 NX Eagle 2019. Complete selection by adding one more.

Selected Bikes

Felt Doctrine 5 NX Eagle 2019
Felt Doctrine 5 NX Eagle 2019

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Frame Felt XC, UHC Performance carbon fiber, MMC with Inside Out construction, full carbon dropouts, Control Taper head tube, Kevlar chain watcher, replaceable derailleur hanger, flat mount disc mounts, BB92, 12 x 148 mm Syntace style thru axle, internal derailleur cable routing
Stem Devox, ±7° rise, Ø31.8 mm with Cr-Mo bolts, XS/SM: 60 mm, M/L: 70 mm, XL: 90 mm
Handle Bar Devox 6061 butted riser, Ø31.8 mm, 15 mm rise, 9° sweep, 720 mm wide
Fork RockShox Recon RL Solo Air, 100 mm travel, OneLoc remote, 15 x 110 mm Boost thru axle
Seatpost Devox butted 6061, dual bolt, 15 mm offset, Ø27.2, XS/SM: 350 mm, MD/LG/XL: 400 mm
Grip Devox Pauley Grip
Crankset SRAM NX Eagle, 34T, SM: 170 mm, MD/LG/XL: 175 mm
Chain SRAM NX, 12-speed
Shifters SRAM NX Eagle, 1 x 12
Saddle Prologo Kappa RS, STN rails
Headset FSA integrated sealed cartridge bearing, No.42ACB-A, 1.125" - 1.5"
Derailleur Rear SRAM NX 12-speed
Hub Front Shimano driver, 12 x 148 mm Boost thru axle, Center Lock, 32H
Hub Rear 15 x 110 mm Boost thru axle, Center Lock, 32H
Spoke 2.0 mm stainless steel
Cassette SRAM NX Eagle, 12-speed, 11-50
Tyres
Front Maxxis Ikon, folding, tubeless ready, 29 x 2.2"
Rear Maxxis Ikon, folding, tubeless ready, 29 x 2.2"
Wheel / RIM Double wall, tubeless compatible, 25 mm inner width
Brakes
Front Shimano MT201 hydraulic disc, 180 mm rotor
Rear Shimano MT201 hydraulic disc, 160 mm rotor
Brake Lever Shimano
Suspension
Front --
Rear --
Colors Available
Colors --


Physical Specs
Length --
Overview
Features --
Additional Details Chainguide : One Up S3, Low direct top guide

Bottom Bracket : SRAM GXP BB92

Seatpost Clamp : Felt single bolt, Ø31.8 mm

Thru Axles : Rear: Felt leverless 12 x 148 x 166L Syntace style, thread: M12 x 1.0

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

8174