Giant TCR Advanced SL Disc 0 vs Trek Domane AL 2 Gen 4

Compare Specifications of Giant TCR Advanced SL Disc 0 and Trek Domane AL 2 Gen 4

Selected Bikes

Giant TCR Advanced SL Disc 0
Giant TCR Advanced SL Disc 0

Brand:

Model:

Trek Domane AL 2 Gen 4
Trek Domane AL 2 Gen 4

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Load Carrying Capacity -- 125 kg (275 lb)
Frame Advanced SL-Grade Composite, integrated seatpost, disc 100 Series Alpha Aluminium, tapered head tube, internal routing, mudguard mounts, flat-mount disc, UDH, 142x12 mm thru axle
Stem Giant Contact SLR, composite Size: 44
Bontrager Elite, 31.8 mm, Blendr-compatible, 7-degree, 70 mm length
Size: 49
Bontrager Elite, 31.8 mm, Blendr-compatible, 7-degree, 80 mm length
Size: 52, 54
Bontrager Elite, 31.8 mm, Blendr-compatible, 7-degree, 90 mm length
Size: 56, 58
Bontrager Elite, 31.8 mm, Blendr-compatible, 7-degree, 100 mm length
Size: 61
Bontrager Elite, 31.8 mm, Blendr-compatible, 7-degree, 110 mm length
Handle Bar Giant Contact SLR, composite Size: 44
Bontrager Comp, alloy, 31.8 mm, 80 mm reach, 121 mm drop, 36 cm control width, 40 cm drop width
Size: 44, 49
Bontrager Comp VR-S, alloy, 31.8 mm, 81 mm reach, 118 mm drop, 38 cm width
Size: 49
Bontrager Comp, alloy, 31.8 mm, 80 mm reach, 121 mm drop, 38 cm control width, 42 cm drop width
Size: 52
Bontrager Comp, alloy, 31.8 mm, 80 mm reach, 121 mm drop, 40 cm control width, 44 cm drop width
Size: 52
Bontrager Comp VR-S, alloy, 31.8 mm, 81 mm reach, 118 mm drop, 40 cm width
Siz
Fork Advanced SL-Grade Composite, full-composite OverDrive 2 steerer, disc Domane AL carbon, tapered carbon steerer, internal brake routing, fender mounts, flat mount disc, 12x100mm thru axle
Seatpost Integrated design Size: 44, 49
Bontrager Comp, 6061 alloy, 27.2 mm, 8 mm offset, 250 mm length

Size: 52, 54, 56, 58, 61
Bontrager Comp, 6061 alloy, 27.2 mm, 8 mm offset, 330 mm length
Grip -- Bontrager Supertack Perf tape
Crankset SRAM RED D1 DUB, 35/48with Quarq DZero power meter Size: 44
Shimano RS200, 50/34 (compact), 165 mm length
Size: 49, 52, 54
Shimano RS200, 50/34 (compact), 170 mm length
Size: 56, 58, 61
Shimano RS200, 50/34 (compact), 175 mm length
Chain SRAM RED D1 Shimano Sora HG71, 8 speed
Shifters SRAM RED eTap AXS Shimano Claris ST-R2000-R, 8 speed, right
Shimano Claris ST-R2000-L, 8 speed, left
Saddle Giant Fleet SLR, composite base, composite rails, UniClip accessory mount Verse Short, steel rails, 145 mm width
Derailleur Front SRAM RED eTap AXS Shimano Claris R2000, 31.8 mm clamp
Derailleur Rear SRAM RED eTap AXS Shimano Claris R2000, medium cage, 34T max cog
Hub Front CADEX Disc WheelSystem, 12 mm thru-axle Formula RX-512 alloy, 6-bolt, 100x12 mm thru axle
Hub Rear CADEX Disc WheelSystem, 12 mm thru-axle Formula RX-142 alloy, 6-bolt, Shimano 11-speed freehub, 142x12 mm thru axle
Spoke CADEX Composite Spoke, DBL technology 14 g stainless steel, black
Cassette SRAM RED, 12-speed, 10 x 28 Shimano HG31, CS-HG31, 11-32, 8 speed
Chainrings -- 1x: 50T, 2x: 50/34
Bottom Bracket SRAM DUB, press fit Shimano UN300, 68 mm, threaded cartridge, 110 mm spindle
Tyres
Front CADEX Race, tubeless, 700 x 25c, folding Bontrager R1 Hard-Case Lite, wire bead, 60 tpi, 700x32 mm
Rear CADEX Race, tubeless, 700 x 25c, folding Bontrager R1 Hard-Case Lite, wire bead, 60 tpi, 700x32 mm
Wheel / RIM CADEX Disc WheelSystem, 42 mm Bontrager Paradigm SL, Tubeless Ready, 24-hole, 21 mm width, Presta valve
Brakes
Front 160 mm, SRAM RED eTap AXS hydraulic Tektro C550 mechanical disc brake, dual piston, flat mount
Tektro wave, 6-bolt, 160 mm
Rear 140 mm, SRAM RED eTap AXS hydraulic Tektro C550 mechanical disc brake, dual piston, flat mount
Tektro wave, 6-bolt, 160 mm
Brake Lever SRAM RED eTap AXS hydraulic --
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors Matte Raw Carbon
Gloss Unicorn White
Crimson to Dark Carmine Fade
Matte Lithium Grey


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight -- 56 - 10.55 kg
Overview
Features -- --
Additional Details Sizes : XS, S, M, ML, L, XL
RideSense ANT+/Bluetooth, Computer mount
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

2234