Honda 2023 PCX 125 vs Vespa Primavera Sean Wotherspoon 125

Compare Specifications of Honda 2023 PCX 125 and Vespa Primavera Sean Wotherspoon 125

Selected Bikes

Honda 2023 PCX 125
Honda 2023 PCX 125

Brand:

Model:

Vespa Primavera Sean Wotherspoon 125
Vespa Primavera Sean Wotherspoon 125

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 125.00 cc 124.00 cc
Engine Single cylinder, water cooled, eSP+ SOHC 4-stroke Single cylinnder, 4 Stroke, 3 Valves per cylinder
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Clutch Automatic, centrifugal, dry type Centrifugal force
Fuel System -- Fuel injection
Cooling System -- Air Cooling
Maximum Power 12.5 PS @ 87502 rpm 10.4 HP@ 8000 RPM
Maximum Torque 11.8 Nm @ 6500 rpm --
Transmission V-Matic Automatic
Drivetrain V-belt --
Top Speed -- 91 kmph
Battery 12V/7Ah (10H) --
Display LCD Display --
Frame Tubular steel duplex --
Headlamp LED --
Taillamp LED --
Fuel Economy
Overall Mileage 47.6 kmpl --
Tyres
Front 110/70-14M/C (50P) --
Rear 130/70-13M/C (63P) --
Wheel / RIM Front: 14M/C x MT2.75, 5 spoke cast aluminium
Front: 14M/C x MT3.50, 5 spoke cast aluminium
Alloy
Brakes
Front 220mm hydraulic disc with combined 2 piston caliper Disc Brake
Rear 130mm drum Drum Brake
Suspension
Front 31mm telescopic fork, 89mm axle travel Strut
Rear Twin suspension aluminium swingarm, 95mm axle travel Unit Swing
Colors Available
Colors Pearl Jasmine White
Pearl Jupiter Grey
Matte Galaxy Black Metallic
Matte Suit Blue Metallic
Sean Wotherspoon


Physical Specs
Length 1935 mm 1870 mm
Width -- 735 mm
Height 1105 mm 1150 mm
Weight 740 kg --
Kerb Weight 130 126
Seat Height 764 790
Wheelbase 1315 mm 1340 mm
Ground Clearance 135 mm --
Fuel Tank Capacity 8.1 litres 8 litres
Overview
About The Honda 2023 PCX 125 features a tubular steel duplex frame and a 125 cc single-cylinder engin Read More --
Features - Smart Key
- 30.4L Under Seat storage space
- USB Type C Socket in the Glovebox
- Honda Selectable Torque Control (HSTC)
--
Additional Details -- Environmental performance : 60 g/km
Fuel consumption : 112 MPG

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

2769