Indian Challenger

Compare Specifications of Indian Challenger. Complete selection by adding one more.

Selected Bikes

Indian Challenger
Indian Challenger

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol
Engine PowerPlus
Fuel System Electronic Fuel Injection System,Closed loop fuel Injection / 52mm dual bore
Maximum Power 122 PS
Maximum Torque 3800 RPM
Headlamp LED
Taillamp LED
Tyres
Front Metzeler Cruisetec 130/60B19 66H
Rear Metzeler Cruisetec 180/60R16 80H
Wheel / RIM Spoke
Brakes
Front Dual / 320mm Semi-Floating Rotor / 4 Piston Radial Caliper
Rear Single / 298mm Floating Rotor / 2 Piston Caliper
Suspension
Front Inverted Telescopic Fork
Rear Single Shock w/Hyd adjust
Colors Available
Colors Titanium Metallic


Physical Specs
Length 2500.7 mm
Width 990.2 mm
Height 1428.5 mm
Weight 377 kg
Kerb Weight 361
Seat Height 672
Wheelbase 1667.8 mm
Ground Clearance 137.3 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 22.7 litres
Overview
Features - Waterproof saddlebags with over 18 gallons of storage space protect against all the elements.
- Class-leading wind protection and control at your fingertips with a power-adjustable windscreen on a chassis-mounted fairing.
- Ride in comfort for longer with electronic cruise control, full LED lighting, a long-haul seat, ABS, and keyless ignition.
- High-output speakers in the fairing deliver 100-watts of crystal-clear audio.
- 7" Touchscreen Display with real-time clock
- Screen will show optional navigation upgraded with traffic and weather overlays.
- 100 Watt Audio System with AM/FM
- Bluetooth®, USB, Smartphone Compatible Input
- Locking Hard Saddlebags
- ABS
Additional Details Exhaust : Split Dual exhaust w/ Resonator
Gear Ratio (1st) : 10.169:1
Gear Ratio (2nd) : 6.933:1
Gear Ratio (3rd) : 5.151:1
Gear Ratio (4th) : 4.105:1
Gear Ratio (5th) : 3.508:1
Gear Ratio (6th) : 3.017:1
Transmission/Final Drive : 2.379:1
Transmission/Primary Drive : Gear Drive Wet Clutch
Front Fork Tube Diameter : 43 mm
Front Travel : 5.1 in (130 mm)
Rear Travel : 4.5 in (114 mm)

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

9170