Keeway Sixties 300i vs Piaggio Beverly S 300

Compare Specifications of Keeway Sixties 300i and Piaggio Beverly S 300

Selected Bikes

Keeway Sixties 300i
Keeway Sixties 300i

Brand:

Model:

Piaggio Beverly S 300
Piaggio Beverly S 300

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 278.20 cc 278.00 cc
Engine 1-cylinder/4-stroke/4-valve Single cylinder 4-stroke, 4 valves, Single overhead camshaft (SOHC) - 4 valves
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Engine Lubrication Pressure splash lubrication Wet sump
Clutch Automatic Automatic centrifugal dry clutch
Fuel System EFI Electronic injection
Ignition TCI --
Cooling System Liquid-cooled Liquid
Maximum Power 19 Ps @ 6500 r/min --
Maximum Torque 22.0 Nm @ 6000 r/min --
Load Carrying Capacity 150 Kg --
Transmission -- CVT continuously variable transmission
Top Speed 120 kmph --
Battery 12V10Ah --
Display Digital Display --
Frame -- Double cradle in high strength tubular steel
Fuel Economy
Overall Mileage -- 30.3 kmpl
Tyres
Front Timsun 120/70-12 Tubeless 110/70 16’’
Rear Timsun 120/70-12 Tubeless 140/70 14’’
Wheel / RIM Alloy Alloy
Brakes
Front 230 mm Disc, caliper Nissin with Bosch ABS 300 mm disc
Rear 220 mm Disc, caliper Nissin with Bosch ABS 240 mm disc
Suspension
Front KYB telescopic forks Hydraulic telescopic fork
Rear Dual shock-absorber KYB, 5-stage adjustable preload Dual hydraulic shock absorbers adjustable in preload
Colors Available
Colors -- ARGENTO COMETA
ARANCIO SUNSET
NERO TEMPESTA


Physical Specs
Length 1985 mm 2125 mm
Width 720 mm 800 mm
Height 1170 mm 1540 mm
Weight 146 kg --
Seat Height 780 --
Wheelbase 1390 mm --
Ground Clearance 140 mm --
Fuel Tank Capacity 10 litres 12 litres
Overview
About The Keeway Sixties 300i combines modern engineering with a nostalgic design. With a 278.20 cc e Read More --
Features -- - 300-ccvHigh Performance Engine
- Matt graphite grey on the luggage rack
- Passenger foot pegs
- Central tunnel
- Black dual-material double-stitched saddle
- Euro 5 compliance
Additional Details -- CO2 Emission: 77 g/Km

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

9398