Kestrel 5000 SL SRAM Red ETap vs Trek Madone SLR 9 Gen 7

• Home ››
• Bikes ››
• Bike Comparison ››
• Kestrel 5000 SL SRAM Red ETap vs Trek Madone SLR 9 Gen 7

Compare Specifications of Kestrel 5000 SL SRAM Red ETap and Trek Madone SLR 9 Gen 7

Selected Bikes

Kestrel 5000 SL SRAM Red ETap Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Trek Madone SLR 9 Gen 7 Brand: -- Select Brand -- / Model: -- Select Model --

Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Technical Specifications

Load Carrying Capacity	--	125 kg (275 lb)
Battery	--	Shimano BT-DN300
Charger	--	Charging cable included
Frame	Kestrel Super Light (KSL) 800K high-modulus carbon fiber, PF30 BB	800 Series OCLV Carbon, KVF (Kammtail Virtual Foil) tube shape, IsoFlow seat tube, invisible cable routing, 3S aero chain keeper, T47 BB, flat mount disc, 142x12 mm thru axle
Stem	Kestrel KSL Aero Carbon	--
Handle Bar	Oval Concepts 970 Jet Stream full-integrated carbon w/ ski-bend carbon extensions	Size: 47 Madone Integrated handlebar/stem, OCLV Carbon, 80 mm reach, 124 mm drop, 35 cm control width, 38 cm drop width, 80 mm stem length Size: 50, 52 Madone Integrated handlebar/stem, OCLV Carbon, 80 mm reach, 124 mm drop, 37 cm control width, 40 cm drop width, 90 mm stem length Size: 54 Madone Integrated handlebar/stem, OCLV Carbon, 80 mm reach, 124 mm drop, 39 cm control width, 42 cm drop width, 90 mm stem length Size: 56, 58 Madone Integrated handlebar/stem, OCLV Carbon, 80 mm reach,
Fork	KSL AERO Pro SL TT full-carbon, 1 1/8" steerer	Madone KVF full carbon, tapered carbon steerer, internal brake routing, flat mount disc, carbon dropouts, 12x100mm thru axle
Seatpost	--	Size: 47, 50, 52, 54 Madone aero carbon seat post, 0 mm offset, short length Size: 56, 58, 60, 62 Madone aero carbon seat post, 0 mm offset, long length
Grip	--	Bontrager Supertack Perf tape
Crankset	SRAM Red, 52/36T	Size: 47 Shimano Dura-Ace R9200, 52/36, 165 mm length Size: 50, 52 Shimano Dura-Ace R9200, 52/36, 170 mm length Size: 54, 56, 58 Shimano Dura-Ace R9200, 52/36, 172.5 mm length Size: 60, 62 Shimano Dura-Ace R9200, 52/36, 175 mm length
Chain	SRAM Red 22, 11-speed	Shimano Dura-Ace/XTR M9100, 12-speed
Shifters	SRAM RED eTAP for TT/Tri, 11-speed	Shimano Dura-Ace R9270 Di2, 12 speed
Saddle	Prologo TGALE TRI, titanium rails w/ U-Cage	Size: 47, 50, 52 Aeolus RSL, carbon rails, 155 mm width Size: 54, 56, 58, 60, 62 Aeolus RSL, carbon rails, 145 mm width
Headset	FSA CX integrated 1 1/8" top, 1 1/8" bottom w/ 10 mm top cover	--
Derailleur Front	SRAM RED eTAP, braze-on	Shimano Dura-Ace R9250 Di2, braze-on, down swing
Derailleur Rear	SRAM RED eTAP, 11-speed	Shimano Dura-Ace R9250 Di2, 34T max cog
Cassette	SRAM RED 22, 11-28T, 11-speed	Shimano Dura-Ace R9200, 11-30, 12-speed
Chainrings	--	1x: 50T, 2x: 54/40
Bottom Bracket	SRAM PF30	Praxis, T47 threaded, internal bearing

Tyres

Front	ZIPP Tangente Speed CL, 700 x 23c, folding	Bontrager R4 320, 700x25 mm
Rear	ZIPP Tangente Speed CL, 700 x 23c, folding	Bontrager R4 320, 700x25 mm
Wheel / RIM	Oval Concepts 985 Tubeless, 700c 16/20H aero carbon rims	F: Bontrager Aeolus RSL 51, OCLV Carbon, Tubeless Ready, 51 mm rim depth, 100x12 mm thru axle R: Bontrager Aeolus RSL 51, OCLV Carbon, Tubeless Ready, 51 mm rim depth, Shimano 11/12 freehub, 142x12 mm thru axle

Brakes

Front	--	Shimano Dura-Ace hydraulic disc Rotors Shimano MT900, CentreLock, 160 mm (Size: 47, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60, 62) Shimano CL900, CentreLock, 160 mm (Size: 47, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60, 62)
Rear	--	Shimano Dura-Ace hydraulic disc Rotors Shimano MT900, CentreLock, 160 mm (Size: 47, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60, 62) Shimano CL900, CentreLock, 160 mm (Size: 47, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60, 62)
Brake Lever	SRAM BL900 for TT/Tri	--

Suspension

Front	--	--
Rear	--	--

Colors Available

Colors

Satin Red Orange

Deep Smoke Azure Satin Quicksilver Axinite Flip/Trek Black Viper Red Metallic Red Smoke to Red Carbon Smoke

Physical Specs

Length	--	--
Weight	8.72 kg	7.1 kg

Overview

Features	--	--
Additional Details	Sizes : 50cm, 52.5cm, 55cm, 57.5cm, 59.5cm	--

Which one do you think is better? And why?

Name :

Comment :

4275