KTM 250 SX-F Adamo Edition 2025 vs Yamaha 2022 YZF-R25

Compare Specifications of KTM 250 SX-F Adamo Edition 2025 and Yamaha 2022 YZF-R25

Selected Bikes

KTM 250 SX-F Adamo Edition 2025
KTM 250 SX-F Adamo Edition 2025

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha 2022 YZF-R25
Yamaha 2022 YZF-R25

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 249.92 cc 250.00 cc
Engine 1-cylinder, 4-stroke engine 4-valves; EURO5;4-stroke;2-Cylinder;Liquid cooled;DOHC
Engine Starting Electric starter Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Wet sump
Clutch Wet multi-disc DS clutch, Brembo hydraulics Wet;Multiple Disc
Fuel System -- Fuel Injection
Ignition -- TCI
Cooling System -- Liquid Cooled
Maximum Power -- 35.9PS @ 12000 RPM
Maximum Torque -- 22.6 NM @ 10.000 RPM
Transmission 5-speed Constant Mesh;6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-n-2-3-4-5-6
Drivetrain -- Final transmission : Chain
Display -- Digital Display
Frame Central double-cradle-type 25CrMo4 steel --
Chain 520, Non-sealed --
Headlamp -- LED
Taillamp -- LED
Tyres
Front -- 110/70-17M/C 54H (Tubeless)
Rear -- 140/70-17M/C 66H (Tubeless)
Wheel / RIM -- Alloy
Brakes
Front Disc - 260 mm Hydraulic single disc, Ø298 mm
Rear Disc - 220 mm Hydraulic single disc, Ø220 mm
Suspension
Front WP XACT-USD, Ø 48 mm Telescopic fork
Front travel : 130 mm
Rear WP XACT Monoshock with linkage Swingarm
Rear Travel : 125 mm
Colors Available
Colors -- Yamaha Black
Icon Blue


Physical Specs
Length -- 2090 mm
Width -- 730 mm
Height -- 1140 mm
Weight 102.5 kg 169 kg
Seat Height 958 780
Wheelbase -- 1380 mm
Ground Clearance 343 mm 160 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 7.2 litres 14 litres
Overview
Features -- - High revving 250cc EU5 engine
- M1 inspired body with new duo-tone
- Icon Blue colour scheme
- Aggressive R1 inspired face
- Lightweight A2-license supersport bike
- Slim and lightweight sports chassis
- R1 inspired dual LED headlights
- 37mm KYB inverted front forks
- Low fuel tank and handlebar position
- Lightweight wheels and supersport tyres
- Powerful braking system with ABS
- Balanced 50/50 weight distribution
- Digital multi-function instruments
Additional Details -- Fuel consumption : 3,8 L / 100 km
Caster Angle : 25º
Trail : 95 mm
CO2 emission : 89g/km
Oil tank capacity : 2.5 L

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

7833