KTM Freeride E-XC 2022 vs KTM Freeride E-XC 2023

Compare Specifications of KTM Freeride E-XC 2022 and KTM Freeride E-XC 2023

Selected Bikes

KTM Freeride E-XC 2022
KTM Freeride E-XC 2022

Brand:

Model:

KTM Freeride E-XC 2023
KTM Freeride E-XC 2023

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Electric Electric
Motor Permanent magnet synchronous motorin a disc armature design Permanent magnet synchronous motor in a disc armature design
Charging Time 1.3 HR Or 110 Minutes for 100 % Charge and 75 minutes for 80 % Charge 110 minutes - 100%
75 minutes - 80%
Engine Starting Electric --
Cooling System Liquid cooled Liquid cooled
Maximum Power 24.5 HP @ 5000 RPM 18kW (24.5 PS) @ 5000 rpm
Maximum Torque 42 NM 42 Nm
Transmission Single-speed automatic Single-speed automatic
Riding Modes -- Economy, Enduro & Cross
Battery Lithium-ion KTM PowerPack (easily removed) 3.9 kWh, 260 V, Lithium-ion KTM PowerPack (easily removed)
Charger 10A Or 13A Charger 10A/13A
Display -- LED display
Frame Perimeter steel-aluminium composite frame Perimeter steel-aluminium composite frame
Handle Bar -- Tapered Neken high Strength aluminum
Chain 5/8 x 1/4" 5/8 x 1/4"
Tyres
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Wheel / RIM -- Giant laced wheels 21"/18"; with anodized aluminum rims
Brakes
Front 260 mm Formula disc brakes 260 mm formula disc brake
Rear 230 mm Formula disc brakes 230 mm formula disc brake
Suspension
Front -- Adjustable WP XPLOR 43 front fork with 250 mm of travel
Rear WP Xplor PDS shock absorber Adjustable WP XPLOR PDS rear shock with 260 mm of travel
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Seat Height 910 910
Ground Clearance 340 mm 340 mm
Overview
Features - State-of-the-art electric motor with 18 kW of maximum output
- Quick change KTM PowerPack with 3.9 kWh capacity
- Adjustable WP XPLOR 43 front fork with 250 mm of travel
- Adjustable WP XPLOR PDS rear shock with 260 mm of travel
- Giant laced wheels 21"/18" with anodized aluminum rims
- New for 2021 FORMULA brakes for improved feeling & performance
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

2875