KYMCO Dink R 125 Tunnel vs Lifan PK110F (LF110-26C)

Compare Specifications of KYMCO Dink R 125 Tunnel and Lifan PK110F (LF110-26C)

Selected Bikes

KYMCO Dink R 125 Tunnel
KYMCO Dink R 125 Tunnel

Brand:

Model:

Lifan PK110F (LF110-26C)
Lifan PK110F (LF110-26C)

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 125.00 cc 109.00 cc
Engine Single cylinder 4 stroke, single overhead camshaft - 4 valves Single-cylinder, air-cooled, four-stroke
Engine Starting Electric Electric/Kick Start
Engine Lubrication Forced --
Clutch Automatic dry centrifuge Auto Clutched
Fuel System Electronic injection --
Cooling System Air cooled --
Maximum Power 11.2 HP @ 8500 RPM 8 Ps @ 7500 Rpm
Maximum Torque 10.6Nm @ 6500 RPM 7.8 Nm @ 6000 Rpm
Transmission V-belt - gears 4 Gears
Top Speed -- 90 kmph
Display Digital LCD: total/trip km counter - speedometer in km/h or mph - tachometer - digital clock - fuel level indicator - battery voltage indicator - coolant indicator --
Frame Steel pipes and stamped plates --
Headlamp LED --
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front 120/70-13 70/90-17
Rear 130/70-13 80/90-17
Wheel / RIM Front 3.0x13” - Rear. 3.5x13” light alloy 5 spokes Al-Alloy or Spoke
Brakes
Front Disc Disc
Rear Disc Drum
Suspension
Front Hydraulic telescopic fork Ø 33 mm --
Rear Single wishbone - double adjustable hydraulic shock absorber --
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length -- 1940 mm
Width -- 705 mm
Height -- 1120 mm
Weight -- 100 kg
Seat Height -- 770
Wheelbase -- 1245 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 6.8 litres 3.7 litres
Overview
About The KYMCO Dink R 125 Tunnel is a stylish and powerful scooter with a single cylinder 4-stroke, Read More --
Features - Digital Display
- LED Lights
- Windshield
Kymco Dink R 125 Tunnel
LED Headlamp

Kymco Dink R 125 Tunnel
Storage Space

Kymco Dink R 125 Tunnel
Windshield

Kymco Dink R 125 Tunnel
Taillamp
- Combined type Front Fender
- Double Sheild
- Magnetic Anti-Lock
- Split Rear Handrail
- Blue Meter Panel
- Crystal Front Headlamp
Additional Details -- Economical Fuel Consumption (L/100km) ≤ 1.5

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

7771