Lifan K19 (LF150-14P) vs Qianjiang QJ125(150)-26E

Compare Specifications of Lifan K19 (LF150-14P) and Qianjiang QJ125(150)-26E

Selected Bikes

Lifan K19 (LF150-14P)
Lifan K19 (LF150-14P)

Brand:

Model:

Qianjiang QJ125(150)-26E
Qianjiang QJ125(150)-26E

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 149.00 cc 149.40 cc
Engine Vertical Single-Cylinder, Air Cooled, Four Stroke 4-Stroke, Single Cylinder , OHV 2V
Engine Starting Electric/Kick Start Kick/Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Forced and Splash
Clutch Hand Clutched Manual, Multiplate Wet Clutch
Fuel System -- Carburetor
Ignition -- CDI
Cooling System -- Air-Cooled
Maximum Power 14 Ps @ 8500 Rpm 11.3 HP @ 8500 RPM
Maximum Torque 13.5 Nm @ 6500 Rpm 10 NM @ 7500 RPM
Seating Capacity -- 2
Transmission 6 Gears Chain
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5
Top Speed 95 kmph --
Frame -- Cradle / Steel
Headlamp -- LED
Tyres
Front 110/90-16 90/90-17 Tubeless
Rear 130/90-15 110/80-17 Tubeless
Wheel / RIM Al-Alloy Alloy
Brakes
Front Disc 240 mm Hydraulic Disk
Rear Drum 130 mm Mechanical Drum
Suspension
Front -- Telescopic 110 mm
Rear -- Unit Swing 58 mm
Colors Available
Colors Camellia Red/Matte Black
Pearl White/Matte Black
Shimmer Black/Matte Black
Red
Black
Green
Blue


Physical Specs
Length 2230 mm 2040 mm
Width 910 mm 760 mm
Height 1090 mm 1070 mm
Weight 160 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 117
Seat Height 710 730
Wheelbase 1500 mm 1260 mm
Ground Clearance 145 mm 185 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 14 litres 16 litres
Overview
About The Lifan K19 (LF150-14P) is a strong and reliable four-stroke motorbike with a 149.00 cc verti Read More --
Features Lifan K19 Lf150 14p
Disc Brake

Lifan K19 Lf150 14p
Handlebar

Lifan K19 Lf150 14p
Fuel Tank
- Aggressive Sporty Design with Powerful engine (7.5/8.5kW) at a more affordable cost
- Sporty Double Seat with upright riding position makes everyday commuting more comfortable
- Better Steering and Riding Comfort with rear Mono-Shock suspension
- 14-Liter Fuel Sporty Tank looks better and goes further
Additional Details Economical Fuel Consumption (L/100km) ≤ 2.0 --

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

8640