Mondraker Podium Carbon

Compare Specifications of Mondraker Podium Carbon. Complete selection by adding one more.

Selected Bikes

Mondraker Podium Carbon
Mondraker Podium Carbon

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Handle Bar ONOFF Sulfur 0.2, double butted 6061 alloy, height: 4.8mm, width: 760mm, 9º backsweep, 0º upsweep, diameter 31.8mm
Chain SRAM NX Eagle, 12v, Powerlock
Saddle Fizik Antares R7
Derailleur Rear SRAM GX Eagle, Type 3 needle bearing clutch, box lock, 1x12v, X-ACTUATION 1: 1
Hub Front DT 370, Boost 12x148mm, LN 18-pawl system, 6-bolt IS, XD core
Hub Rear DT 370, Boost 15x110mm, IS 6 bolts
Bottom Bracket SRAM DUB BSA, sealed bearings, 73mm
Tyres
Front Maxxis Rekon Race 29x2.35, EXO shell, tubeless ready, 120TPI, folding bead
Rear Maxxis Rekon Race 29x2.35, EXO shell, tubeless ready, 120TPI, folding bead
Maxxis Rekon Race 29x2.35, EXO shell, tubeless ready, 120TPI, folding bead
Brakes
Front SRAM Level TL, two-piece caliper, one-piece IS 160mm 6-bolt Centerline rotor, organic pads
Rear SRAM Level TL, two-piece caliper, one-piece IS 160mm 6-bolt Centerline rotor, organic pads
Brake Lever SRAM Level TL, Direct Link actuation, reach adjust with tools, lever spindle with bushings
Suspension
Front --
Rear --
Colors Available
Colors Red


Physical Specs
Length --
Overview
Features --
Additional Details Pinions :SRAM XG-1275, 10-50T, 12v
Derailleur hanger : SRAM UDH
Controls - change buttons : SRAM Eagle AXS, 12v Rocker paddle
Shank : ONOFF Helium Carbon 0-R VFLEX, diameter 27.2mm, length 400mm
Power : MDK, 6061 T6 alloy, for 31.8mm handlebars, rise: +/- 5º, length depending on bike size: S / M: 60mm, L: 70mm, XL: 80mm
Connecting rods : SRAM GX Eagle, Boost, DUB axle, Direct Mount, S: 170mm, M / L / XL: 175mm
Radios : DT Champion, straight pull
Cuffs : ONOFF Diamond, 1 lock-on, 135mm
Damper adjustment : Firm compression, light bounce, token 0.2
Sizes : S: 390mm / M: 420mm / L: 470mm / XL: 510mm
Fork remote control :Single shot fox

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

9368