MV Agusta 2021 Brutale 800 Rosso vs Yamaha 2022 XSR900

Compare Specifications of MV Agusta 2021 Brutale 800 Rosso and Yamaha 2022 XSR900

Selected Bikes

MV Agusta 2021 Brutale 800 Rosso
MV Agusta 2021 Brutale 800 Rosso

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha 2022 XSR900
Yamaha 2022 XSR900

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Motor Voltage :12 V --
Engine Displacement 798.00 cc 890.00 cc
Engine Three cylinder, 4 stroke, 12 valve , “D.O.H.C” with mechanical chain tensioner and DLC tappet Liquid-cooled DOHC inline 3-cylinder 4-stroke; 12 valves
Engine Starting Electric --
Clutch Multi-disc wet clutch with hydraulic actuation and back torque limiting device --
Fuel System -- Yamaha Fuel Injection with YCC-T
Ignition -- TCI: Transistor Controlled Ignition
Cooling System Cooling with separated liquid and oil radiators --
Maximum Power 112 HP @ 11000 RPM --
Maximum Torque 85 NM @ 8500 RPM --
Transmission Cassette style; six speed, constant mesh 6-speed; multiplate assist-and-slipper wet clutch
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 --
Drivetrain Primary drive : 22/41
Final drive ratio : 16/41
Final Drive: Chain
Top Speed 237.0 kmph --
Battery 12 V - 8.5 Ah --
Display Digital Full-Color 3.5-inch TFT Instrument Display
Frame ALS Steel tubular trellis
Rear swing arm pivot plates material : Aluminium alloy
--
Gear First gear: Speed
13/37
Second gear: Speed
16/35
Third gear: Speed
18/32
Fourth gear: Speed
20/30
Fifth gear: Speed
22/29
Sixth gear: Speed
21/25
--
Headlamp LED --
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front 120/70 - ZR 17 M/C (58 W) 120/70ZR17 Bridgestone® Battlax Hypersport S22
Rear 180/55 - ZR 17 M/C (73 W) 180/55ZR17 Bridgestone® Battlax Hypersport S22
Wheel / RIM Front wheel : Aluminium alloy 3.50 ” x 17 ”
Rear wheel : Aluminium alloy 5.50 ” x 17 ”
--
Brakes
Front Double floating disc with Ø 320 mm (Ø 12.6 in.) diameter, with steel braking disc and flange
Front brake caliper : Brembo radial-type, with 4 pistons Ø 32 mm (Ø 1.26 in.)
298mm dual hydraulic discs; ABS
Rear Single steel disc with Ø 220 mm (Ø 8.66 in.) dia.
Rear brake caliper : Brembo with 2 pistons — Ø 34 mm (Ø 1.34 in.)
245mm single hydraulic disc; ABS
ABS Continental MK100 with RLM (Rear Wheel Lift-up Mitigation) and with cornering function --
Suspension
Front 43 mm Marzocchi “UPSIDE DOWN” telescopic hydraulic fork with rebound-compression damping and spring preload external and separate adjustment 41mm inverted fork, adjustable preload, compression and rebound; 5.1-in travel
Rear Progressive Sachs, single shock absorber with rebound and compression damping and spring preload adjustment Single shock, adjustable preload and rebound damping; 5.4-in travel
Colors Available
Colors Matt Ago Red Legend Blue
Raven


Physical Specs
Length 2045 mm 2153 mm
Width 875 mm 861 mm
Height 830 mm 1155 mm
Kerb Weight 175 --
Seat Height -- 810
Wheelbase 1400 mm 1496 mm
Ground Clearance 135 mm 139 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 16.5 litres 14 litres
Overview
Features - MV Ride App
- GPS sensor
- Bluetooth
- Cruise control
Tuned Triple Soundtrack
New Six-Axis IMU with Rider Aids
Cruise Control
Lean Sensitive Traction Control System
Slide Control System (SCS)
LIFT Control System (LIF)
Brake Control System (BC)
Advanced Ride-by-Wire Throttle with APSG
Advanced Up & Down Quick Shift Now Standard
Assist & Slipper (A&S) Clutch
Additional Details Engine management system :
Integrated ignition - injection system MVICS 2.1 (Motor & Vehicle Integrated Control System) with three injectors. Engine control unit Eldor Nemo 2.1, throttle body full ride by wire Mikuni, pencil-coil. Torque control with four maps, Traction Control with eight levels of intervention.
Electronic quick-shift : MV EAS 3.0 (Electronically Assisted Shift up & down)
Alternator : 350 W at 5000 r.p.m.
Single sided swing arm material : Aluminium alloy
Wheel travel : 130 mm
Fork travel : 125 mm
Fairing material : Thermoplastic
Trail : 1035 mm
Environmental Standard : Euro 5
Combined fuel consumption : 5.1 l/100 km
CO2 Emissions : 117 g/km
Rake (Caster Angle): 25.0°
Trail: 4.3 in
Wet Weight: 425 lb
Fuel Economy: 49 mpg

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

3958