Pacific CarryMe SD vs Reid Granite 1.0

Compare Specifications of Pacific CarryMe SD and Reid Granite 1.0

Selected Bikes

Pacific CarryMe SD
Pacific CarryMe SD

Brand:

Model:

Reid Granite 1.0
Reid Granite 1.0

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Load Carrying Capacity 100kg(incl. rider & luggage) --
Frame Pacific CARRYME AL7005 w/ replaceable rear fork and trolley wheels Double butted 6061 alloy with integrated headset
Stem Stem Extension : 6061T6 telescopic 350mm anodized Alloy oversize a head road stem 80mm-100mm
Handle Bar -- Oversize compact drop bars 400mm-440mm (flared)
Fork Pacific CARRYME AL7005 Alloy a head gravel fork
Seatpost Promax SP-222 31.6x365mm anodized Alloy micro adjust 27.2 mm
Grip -- Reid bar tape
Pedals VP-FLD 50 foldable black plastic Alloy platform
Chain 1/4x1/8" 166L Kmc z8.3 7 speed
Prowheel alloy compact chainset 34/50t 170mm chain set
Shifters -- Shimano ao70 14 speed sti shifters
Saddle CarryMe Taunus vacuum forming black Selle royal
Headset 1-1/8" threaded --
Derailleur Front -- Shimano a070 double
Derailleur Rear -- Shimano a070 7 speed
Hub Front Integrated housing w/ sealed bearings Quando alloy quick release 32h
Hub Rear -- Quando alloy quick release 32h
Cassette -- Shimano hg200 cassette 12-32t
Bottom Bracket -- Sealed bearing square taper
Tyres
Front 8"x1-1/4 80psi Kenda k1109 700 x 40c
Rear 8"x1-1/4 80psi Kenda k1109 700 x 40c
Wheel / RIM Rim : Pacific CARRYME alloy forged rim, Rear w/integrated Drum Brake Reid double-wall alloy 32h
Brakes
Front Alloy side pull Tektro md-c310 cable disc 160mm rotor
Rear Sturmey Archer Drum Brake Tektro md-c310 cable disc 160mm rotor
Brake Lever Tektro CL330/335 bell integrated --
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors Red
Green
Orange
White
Yellow
Blue
--


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight 8.4 kg 12.40 kg
Overview
Features Chainwheel : Pacific CARRYME 84T 160mm w/ CG
Freewheel : CARRYME 1/4"x1/8"x14T freewheel
Dimensions : Folded: 32cm(H) x 25cm (W) x 91cm(L)
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1200