Reid Falco Sport vs Rondo Mutt AL

Compare Specifications of Reid Falco Sport and Rondo Mutt AL

Selected Bikes

Reid Falco Sport
Reid Falco Sport

Brand:

Model:

Rondo Mutt AL
Rondo Mutt AL

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Frame 6061 aluminium alloy with integrated headset RUUT CUSTOM FORMED AL6061-T6
Stem Alloy oversize a-head 90mm-110mm RONDO 80 MM(S), 90 MM(M), 110 MM(L), 110 MM(XL)
Handle Bar Oversize compact drop 420mm Rondo Road 400 MM(S), 420 MM(M,L), 440 MM(XL)
Fork Carbon fibre with alloy steerer TWINTIP CARBON
Seatpost Alloy micro adjust 27.2 mm RONDO 350 X 27.2
Grip Reid bar tape VELO COMFORT TAPE
Crankset -- FSA OMEGA COMPACT 48/32T
Pedals Alloy platform --
Chain Kmc z7 Shimano HG500
Shifters Shimano claris 16-speed sti Shimano Tiagra ST4720
Saddle Reid sport FABRIC SCOOP FLAT
Headset -- UPPER STACK: IS 42 / 28,6 LOWER STACK: IS 52 / 40 SHIS
Derailleur Front Shimano claris fd-r2000 double Shimano 105 FD-R7000
Derailleur Rear Shimano claris fd-r2000 8 speed Shimano Tiagra RD4700
Hub Front Quando quick release 28h RONDO SUPERLIGHT SEALED BEARINGS
Hub Rear Quando quick release 28h RONDO SUPERLIGHT SEALED BEARINGS
Cassette Shimano 8-speed 12-32t Shimano KSCHG500 11-32T 10 SPEED
Bottom Bracket Sealed bearing square taper PF86
Tyres
Front Kenda k176 700 x 28c WTB 650B X 47 BYWAY FRONT/HORIZON REAR
Rear Kenda k176 700 x 28c WTB 650B X 47 BYWAY FRONT/HORIZON REAR
Wheel / RIM Reid double wall alloy RONDO Alu 584-23 TUBELESS COMPATIBLE
Brakes
Front Tektro r313 dual-pivot calliper SHIMANO BR4770 HYDRAULIC BRAKES
Rear Tektro r313 dual-pivot calliper SHIMANO BR4770 HYDRAULIC BRAKES
Brake Lever Shimano claris sti --
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight -- 11.1 kg
Overview
Features -- --
Additional Details Chainset: Prowheel ounce alloy compact 34/50t Frame sizes : XS, S, M, L, XL
Axle front : 100/12mm/thread 1.5
Axle rear : 142/12mm/thread 1.75
Fenders : Front fender in LO possition only

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

7188