Steamoon Pavilion-X vs Trek Checkpoint SLR 9 AXS

Compare Specifications of Steamoon Pavilion-X and Trek Checkpoint SLR 9 AXS

Selected Bikes

Steamoon Pavilion-X
Steamoon Pavilion-X

Brand:

Model:

Trek Checkpoint SLR 9 AXS
Trek Checkpoint SLR 9 AXS

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Electric Electric
Motor Bafang commercial M620 1000W mid motor,Triple sensor system(1 torque,2 speed sensors) delivers instantaneous response to pedal-power input --
Range Up to 55 Miles --
Charging Time Charges the scooter full in 6 hours --
Maximum Torque 160 NM --
Load Carrying Capacity Load Capacity : 300 pounds --
Battery Samsung lithium battery | 48V 10.4Ah/17.5 SRAM eTap battery pack (with charger)
Charger Quick Charger : 3.0 Amp --
Display Bafang DP C18.CAN,Color Matrix Display --
Frame 26 inch 6061 aluminum alloy design based on human 700 Series OCLV Carbon, IsoSpeed, downtube storage door, internal routing, Ride Tuned seat mast, chain keeper, T47 BB, mudguard mounts, integrated frame bag mounts, flat-mount disc, 142x12 mm thru axle
Stem -- Size: 49
Bontrager RSL Carbon, 31.8 mm clamp, 7-degree, 70 mm length
Size: 52, 54
Bontrager RSL Carbon, 31.8 mm clamp, 7-degree, 80 mm length
Size: 56, 58
Bontrager RSL Carbon, 31.8 mm clamp, 7-degree, 90 mm length
Size: 61
Bontrager RSL Carbon, 31.8 mm clamp, 7-degree, 100 mm length
Handle Bar -- Size: 49
Bontrager Pro IsoCore VR-SF, 38cm
Size: 52
Bontrager Pro IsoCore VR-SF, 40cm
Size: 54, 56
Bontrager Pro IsoCore VR-SF, 42cm
Size: 58, 61
Bontrager Pro IsoCore VR-SF, 44cm
Fork -- Checkpoint carbon, tapered carbon steerer, mudguard mounts, flat-mount disc, 12x100 mm thru axle
Seatpost -- Size: 49, 52, 54, 56
Bontrager carbon seat mast cap, 5 mm offset, short length
Size: 58, 61
Bontrager carbon seat mast cap, 5 mm offset, tall length
Crankset -- Size: 49
SRAM RED AXS w/ power meter, 40T, DUB, 165 mm length
Size: 52
SRAM RED AXS w/ power meter, 40T, DUB, 170 mm length
Size: 54, 56
SRAM RED AXS w/ power meter, 40T, DUB, 172.5 mm length
Size: 58, 61
SRAM RED AXS w/ power meter, 40T, DUB, 175 mm length
Chain Rust resistant chain, KMC SRAM RED D1, 12-speed
Shifters -- SRAM RED eTap AXS, 12-speed
Gear Outer 7 speed SHIMANO/Outer 11 speed SRAM --
Saddle Sport type JUSTEK/SR Size: 49, 52
Verse Short Pro, carbon rails, 155 mm width
Size: 54, 56, 58, 61
Verse Short Pro, carbon rails, 145 mm width
Derailleur Rear -- SRAM RED XPLR eTap AXS, 44T max cog
Cassette -- SRAM XG-1271, 10-44, 12-speed
Bottom Bracket -- SRAM DUB, T47 threaded, internal bearing
Tyres
Front CST BFT Fat tire C1752 26 4.0/KENDA 26 4.0 Bontrager GR1 Team Issue, Tubeless Ready, Inner Strength casing, aramid bead, 120 tpi, 700x40 mm
Rear CST BFT Fat tire C1752 26 4.0/KENDA 26 4.0 Bontrager GR1 Team Issue, Tubeless Ready, Inner Strength casing, aramid bead, 120 tpi, 700x40 mm
Wheel / RIM -- Wheel front Bontrager Aeolus RSL 37V, OCLV Carbon, Tubeless Ready, 37 mm rim depth, 100 x 12mm thru axle
Wheel rear Bontrager Aeolus RSL 37V, OCLV Carbon, Tubeless Ready, 37 mm rim depth, 142 x 12mm thru axle
Brakes
Front Tektro E350 2-Piston Hydraulic Disc SRAM Red AXS hydraulic disc
Rear Tektro E350 2-Piston Hydraulic Disc SRAM Red AXS hydraulic disc
Suspension
Front Aluminum alloy suspension GTMRK --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length 1650 mm --
Width 300 mm --
Height 800 mm --
Weight 32 kg 8.10 kg
Kerb Weight 28 --
Overview
Features - The Pavilion-X is built around a lightweight aluminum alloy chassis
- The lockable battery uses high-quality Lithium cells to deliver power to the 1000-watt Bafang mid-drive motor.
- Pedal-assist rates can be adjusted to five levels giving the rider from 25-75 miles of assisted pedaling.
- The thumb-operated throttle can power the Pavilion-X to 20 mph (max speed for Class 2 electric bikes)
- Tires that are wider than 2.8-inches, often 4″ or 4.8″ wide
- The air inside can squish to act as a shock absorber and be lowered to help the tire spread out and float over soft terrain
- With the introduction of electric bike technology, the niche has become much more mainstream because motor systems more than offset the weight and drag of fat tires, making them more enjoyable for less athletic riders
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

516