Steamoon Pavilion-X vs Trek Fuel EXe 9.9 XX AXS T-Type

Compare Specifications of Steamoon Pavilion-X and Trek Fuel EXe 9.9 XX AXS T-Type

Selected Bikes

Steamoon Pavilion-X
Steamoon Pavilion-X

Brand:

Model:

Trek Fuel EXe 9.9 XX AXS T-Type
Trek Fuel EXe 9.9 XX AXS T-Type

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Electric Electric
Motor Bafang commercial M620 1000W mid motor,Triple sensor system(1 torque,2 speed sensors) delivers instantaneous response to pedal-power input TQ-HPR50, 50 Nm, 250 watt maximum continuous rated power, 300 watt peak power
Range Up to 55 Miles --
Charging Time Charges the scooter full in 6 hours --
Maximum Torque 160 NM --
Load Carrying Capacity Load Capacity : 300 pounds --
Battery Samsung lithium battery | 48V 10.4Ah/17.5 TQ 360Wh
SRAM eTap battery pack (with charger)
Charger Quick Charger : 3.0 Amp --
Display Bafang DP C18.CAN,Color Matrix Display TQ LED display with Bluetooth & ANT+ connectivity
Frame 26 inch 6061 aluminum alloy design based on human OCLV Mountain Carbon, removable battery, internal routing, alloy rocker link, 34.9 mm seat tube, upper chain guide mount, 55 mm chainline, Mino Link, ABP, Boost148, UDH, 140 mm travel
Handle Bar -- Size: S
Bontrager RSL Integrated handlebar/stem, OCLV Carbon, 27.5 mm handlebar rise, 820 mm width, 0-degree stem rise, 35 mm stem length
Size: M, L, XL
Bontrager RSL Integrated handlebar/stem, OCLV Carbon, 27.5 mm handlebar rise, 820 mm width, 0-degree stem rise, 45mm stem length
Fork -- RockShox Lyrik Ultimate, AirWiz, DebonAir spring, Charger 3 RC2 damper, 44 mm offset, Boost110, Maxle Stealth, 150 mm travel
Seatpost -- Size: S
RockShox Reverb AXS, 100 mm travel, wireless, 34.9 mm, 340 mm length
Size: M
RockShox Reverb AXS, 150 mm travel, wireless, 34.9 mm, 440 mm length
Size: L, XL
RockShox Reverb AXS, 170 mm travel, wireless, 34.9 mm, 480 mm length
Grip -- Bontrager XR Trail Elite, nylon lock-on
Crankset -- SRAM XX, 165 mm length
Chain Rust resistant chain, KMC SRAM XX Eagle, T-Type, 12-speed
Shifters -- SRAM AXS POD Ultimate, paired with dropper
Gear Outer 7 speed SHIMANO/Outer 11 speed SRAM --
Saddle Sport type JUSTEK/SR Bontrager Arvada, austenite rails, 138 mm width
Headset -- Integrated cartridge bearing, 1-1/8" top, 1.5" bottom
Derailleur Rear -- SRAM XX Eagle AXS, T-Type
Cassette -- SRAM Eagle XS-1297, T-Type, 10-52, 12-speed
Chainrings -- SRAM T-Type, 32T, alloy
Tyres
Front CST BFT Fat tire C1752 26 4.0/KENDA 26 4.0 Bontrager SE5 Team Issue, Tubeless Ready, Core Strength sidewalls, aramid bead, 120 tpi, 29x2.50"
Rear CST BFT Fat tire C1752 26 4.0/KENDA 26 4.0 Bontrager SE5 Team Issue, Tubeless Ready, Core Strength sidewalls, aramid bead, 120 tpi, 29x2.50"
Wheel / RIM -- Wheel front - Bontrager Line Pro 30, OCLV Mountain Carbon, Tubeless Ready, 6-bolt, Boost110, 15 mm thru-axle, 29"
Wheel rear - Bontrager Line Pro 30, OCLV Mountain Carbon, Tubeless Ready, Rapid Drive 108, 6-bolt, SRAM XD driver, Boost148, 12 mm thru-axle, 29"
Brakes
Front Tektro E350 2-Piston Hydraulic Disc SRAM Code Ultimate 4-piston hydraulic disc
Rear Tektro E350 2-Piston Hydraulic Disc SRAM Code Ultimate 4-piston hydraulic disc
Suspension
Front Aluminum alloy suspension GTMRK --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length 1650 mm --
Width 300 mm --
Height 800 mm --
Weight 32 kg 18.50 kg
Kerb Weight 28 --
Overview
Features - The Pavilion-X is built around a lightweight aluminum alloy chassis
- The lockable battery uses high-quality Lithium cells to deliver power to the 1000-watt Bafang mid-drive motor.
- Pedal-assist rates can be adjusted to five levels giving the rider from 25-75 miles of assisted pedaling.
- The thumb-operated throttle can power the Pavilion-X to 20 mph (max speed for Class 2 electric bikes)
- Tires that are wider than 2.8-inches, often 4″ or 4.8″ wide
- The air inside can squish to act as a shock absorber and be lowered to help the tire spread out and float over soft terrain
- With the introduction of electric bike technology, the niche has become much more mainstream because motor systems more than offset the weight and drag of fat tires, making them more enjoyable for less athletic riders
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

3887