Suzuki 2024 DR650S vs Yamaha R6 GYTR

Compare Specifications of Suzuki 2024 DR650S and Yamaha R6 GYTR

Selected Bikes

Suzuki 2024 DR650S
Suzuki 2024 DR650S

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha R6 GYTR
Yamaha R6 GYTR

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 644.00 cc 599.00 cc
Engine 4-stroke, air-cooled, single cylinder, SOHC 4-valve, 4-stroke, EURO4, Liquid-cooled, DOHC, Forward-inclined in-line 4-cylinder
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Engine Lubrication Wet sump wet sump
Clutch Wet multi-plate --
Fuel System Mikuni BST40, single carburetor Fuel injection
Ignition Electronic ignition (CDI) Transistor
Cooling System -- Liquid-cooled
Maximum Power -- 118.4 PS @ 14,500 rpm
Maximum Torque -- 61.7 NM @ 10,500 rpm
Seating Capacity -- 1
Transmission 5-speed constant mesh Sequential gearbox, 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Drivetrain -- Chain
Display -- Digital
Frame -- Tubular bridge frame
Headlamp 12V 60/55W (H4) LED
Taillamp 12V 21/5W LED
Tyres
Front 90/90-21 M/C 54S, tube type 120/70 ZR17M/C (58W) Tubeless
Rear 120/90-17 M/C 64S, tube type 180/55 ZR17M/C (73W) Tubeless
Wheel / RIM 21", 17" Wheels Alloy
Brakes
Front Disc brake, single floating rotor Hydraulic double disc brake, Ø 320 mm
Rear Disc brake, single rotor Hydraulic disc brake, Ø 220 mm
Suspension
Front Telescopic, coil spring, oil damped Upside-down telescopic fork, Ø 43 mm 120mm
Rear Link type, coil spring, oil damped Suspension strut linked via a lever system, swing arm 120mm
Colors Available
Colors Solid Black & Iron Gray
Solid Special White No. 2
Primer White


Physical Specs
Length 2255 mm 2040 mm
Width 865 mm 695 mm
Height 1195 mm 1150 mm
Kerb Weight 166 190
Seat Height 885 850
Wheelbase 1490 mm 1375 mm
Ground Clearance 265 mm 130 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 13 litres 17 litres
Overview
Features -- -GYTR engine parts
-GYTR electronics
-GYTR suspension parts
-Compact Deltabox frame with a lightweight magnesium rear frame
-Lightweight aluminum tank
Additional Details -- Fuel consumption: 6.6L/100km
CO2 emission: 154g/km

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

3924