Suzuki 2024 Hayabusa vs Yamaha 2022 Super Tenere ES

Compare Specifications of Suzuki 2024 Hayabusa and Yamaha 2022 Super Tenere ES

Selected Bikes

Suzuki 2024 Hayabusa
Suzuki 2024 Hayabusa

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha 2022 Super Tenere ES
Yamaha 2022 Super Tenere ES

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 1340.00 cc 1199.00 cc
Engine 4-stroke, liquid-cooled, 4-cylinder, DOHC Liquid-cooled inline 2-cylinder; DOHC; 8 valves
Engine Starting Electric --
Engine Lubrication Wet sump --
Clutch Wet, multi-plate type, SCAS-equipped --
Fuel System Fuel injection with Ride-by-Wire throttle bodies Fuel Injection with YCC-T
Ignition Electronic ignition (transistorized) TCI: Transistor Controlled Ignition
Transmission 6-speed constant mesh 6-speed; multi-plate wet clutch
Drivetrain -- Final Drive: Shaft
Headlamp Multi-plane and projector LED --
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front 120/70ZR17M/C (58W), tubeless 110/80R19
Rear 190/50ZR17M/C (73W), tubeless 150/70R17
Brakes
Front Brembo Stylema, 4-piston, twin disc, ABS-equipped Dual 310mm hydraulic disc, Unified Brake System and ABS
Rear Nissin, 1-piston, single disc, ABS-equipped 282mm single disc, Unified Brake System and ABS
Suspension
Front Inverted telescopic, coil spring, oil damped 43mm inverted fork; electronically adjustable compression and rebound damping; 7.5-in travel
Rear Link type, single shock, coil spring, oil damped Monoshock; electronically adjustable preload and rebound damping; 7.5-in of travel
Colors Available
Colors Metallic Matte Black No. 2 & Glass Sparkle Black or Metallic Thunder Gray & Candy Daring Red Matte Raven Black


Physical Specs
Length 2180 mm 2255 mm
Width 735 mm 980 mm
Height 1165 mm 1409 mm
Kerb Weight 264 --
Seat Height 800 845-871
Wheelbase 1480 mm 1539 mm
Ground Clearance 125 mm --
Fuel Tank Capacity 20 litres 23 litres
Overview
Features -- Luggage Ready
Beefy Controls
Standard Centerstand
Electronic Suspension
Cruise Control
Traction Control
D-Mode Throttle
All-Purpose Drivetrain
Advanced Fuel Injection
Additional Details -- Fuel Economy: 43 mpg
Wet Weight: 584 lb
Rake (Caster Angle): 28.0°

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

5860