Trek 520 Disc vs Trek Madone SLR 9 Gen 7

Compare Specifications of Trek 520 Disc and Trek Madone SLR 9 Gen 7

Selected Bikes

Trek 520 Disc
Trek 520 Disc

Brand:

Model:

Trek Madone SLR 9 Gen 7
Trek Madone SLR 9 Gen 7

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Load Carrying Capacity -- 125 kg (275 lb)
Battery -- Shimano BT-DN300
Charger -- Charging cable included
Frame Trek butted chromoly disc touring, rack & fender mounts 800 Series OCLV Carbon, KVF (Kammtail Virtual Foil) tube shape, IsoFlow seat tube, invisible cable routing, 3S aero chain keeper, T47 BB, flat mount disc, 142x12 mm thru axle
Stem Bontrager Elite, 31.8 mm, 7 degree, Blendr compatible --
Handle Bar Bontrager Race VR-C, 31.8 mm Size: 47
Madone Integrated handlebar/stem, OCLV Carbon, 80 mm reach, 124 mm drop, 35 cm control width, 38 cm drop width, 80 mm stem length
Size: 50, 52
Madone Integrated handlebar/stem, OCLV Carbon, 80 mm reach, 124 mm drop, 37 cm control width, 40 cm drop width, 90 mm stem length
Size: 54
Madone Integrated handlebar/stem, OCLV Carbon, 80 mm reach, 124 mm drop, 39 cm control width, 42 cm drop width, 90 mm stem length
Size: 56, 58
Madone Integrated handlebar/stem, OCLV Carbon, 80 mm reach,
Fork Chromoly touring disc with lowrider mounts Madone KVF full carbon, tapered carbon steerer, internal brake routing, flat mount disc, carbon dropouts, 12x100mm thru axle
Seatpost Bontrager SSR, 2-bolt head, 27.2 mm, 12 mm offset Size: 47, 50, 52, 54
Madone aero carbon seat post, 0 mm offset, short length
Size: 56, 58, 60, 62
Madone aero carbon seat post, 0 mm offset, long length
Grip Bontrager Gel Cork Bontrager Supertack Perf tape
Crankset Shimano Trekking M590 Size: 47
Shimano Dura-Ace R9200, 52/36, 165 mm length
Size: 50, 52
Shimano Dura-Ace R9200, 52/36, 170 mm length
Size: 54, 56, 58
Shimano Dura-Ace R9200, 52/36, 172.5 mm length
Size: 60, 62
Shimano Dura-Ace R9200, 52/36, 175 mm length
Pedals Nylon platform with cages --
Chain KMC X9 Shimano Dura-Ace/XTR M9100, 12-speed
Shifters Shimano Dura-Ace handlebar-end Shimano Dura-Ace R9270 Di2, 12 speed
Saddle Bontrager Evoke 1 Size: 47, 50, 52
Aeolus RSL, carbon rails, 155 mm width
Size: 54, 56, 58, 60, 62
Aeolus RSL, carbon rails, 145 mm width
Headset VP Slimstak, sealed semi-cartridge bearings --
Derailleur Front Shimano Alivio Shimano Dura-Ace R9250 Di2, braze-on, down swing
Derailleur Rear Shimano Deore Shimano Dura-Ace R9250 Di2, 34T max cog
Hub Front Shimano M475 --
Hub Rear Shimano M475 --
Cassette -- Shimano Dura-Ace R9200, 11-30, 12-speed
Chainrings 48 / 36 / 26 with chainguard 1x: 50T, 2x: 54/40
Bottom Bracket -- Praxis, T47 threaded, internal bearing
Tyres
Front Bontrager AW1 Hard-Case, 700 x 32 c Bontrager R4 320, 700x25 mm
Rear Bontrager AW1 Hard-Case, 700 x 32 c Bontrager R4 320, 700x25 mm
Wheel / RIM Bontrager Tubeless Ready 36-hole F: Bontrager Aeolus RSL 51, OCLV Carbon, Tubeless Ready, 51 mm rim depth, 100x12 mm thru axle
R: Bontrager Aeolus RSL 51, OCLV Carbon, Tubeless Ready, 51 mm rim depth, Shimano 11/12 freehub, 142x12 mm thru axle
Brakes
Front Hayes CX Expert mechanical disc Shimano Dura-Ace hydraulic disc

Rotors
Shimano MT900, CentreLock, 160 mm (Size: 47, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60, 62)
Shimano CL900, CentreLock, 160 mm (Size: 47, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60, 62)
Rear Hayes CX Expert mechanical disc Shimano Dura-Ace hydraulic disc

Rotors
Shimano MT900, CentreLock, 160 mm (Size: 47, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60, 62)
Shimano CL900, CentreLock, 160 mm (Size: 47, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60, 62)
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors Cosmic Black Deep Smoke
Azure
Satin Quicksilver
Axinite Flip/Trek Black
Viper Red
Metallic Red Smoke to Red Carbon Smoke


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight -- 7.1 kg
Overview
Features - You'll feel the difference: nothing rides like a Trek
- Low touring mounts front and rear stabilize heavy loads
- Disc brakes give you all-weather stopping power
- Balanced geometry is ultra-stable even when fully loaded
--
Additional Details Bottom Bracket : Sealed cartridge
Rear Cogs : Shimano HG50, 11-32, 9 speed
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

8425