Triumph Scrambler 1200 Bond Edition vs Yamaha 2024 TT-R230

Compare Specifications of Triumph Scrambler 1200 Bond Edition and Yamaha 2024 TT-R230

Selected Bikes

Triumph Scrambler 1200 Bond Edition
Triumph Scrambler 1200 Bond Edition

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha 2024 TT-R230
Yamaha 2024 TT-R230

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement -- 223.00 cc
Engine Liquid-cooled, 8 valve, SOHC, 270° crank angle parallel-twin --
Clutch Wet, multi-plate assist clutch --
Fuel System Multipoint sequential electronic fuel injection Carburetor
Ignition -- CDI
Cooling System Liquid-cooled --
Maximum Power 89 Hp @7400 rpm --
Maximum Torque 110 Nm @ 3950 rpm --
Transmission 6-speed Constant-mesh 6-speed; multiplate wet clutch
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 --
Frame Tubular steel with aluminium cradle --
Tyres
Front 90/90-21 80/100-21
Rear 150/70 R17 100/100-18
Wheel / RIM Front Wheel : Tubeless 36-spoke 21 x 2.15 in, aluminium rims
Rear Wheel : Tubeless 32-spoke 17 x 4.25 in, aluminium rims
--
Brakes
Front Twin 320 mm discs, Brembo M50 monoblock calipers, radial master cylinder. Switchable Optimized Cornering ABS Hydraulic single disc, 220mm
Rear Single 255 mm disc, Brembo 2-piston floating caliper. Switchable Optimized Cornering ABS Drum, 130mm
Suspension
Front Showa 47 mm fully adjustable USD forks. 250 mm wheel travel Telescopic fork; 9.4-in travel
Rear Öhlins fully adjustable piggy-back RSUs with twin springs. 250 mm wheel travel Single shock; 8.7-in travel
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length -- 2065.02 mm
Width -- 800.1 mm
Height 1250 mm 1181.1 mm
Weight -- 113.8 kg
Kerb Weight 207 --
Handlebar Width 905 --
Seat Height 870 871.22
Wheelbase 1570 mm 1384.3 mm
Ground Clearance -- 294.64 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 16 litres 7.9 litres
Overview
Features -- --
Additional Details Exhaust : Brushed 2 into 2 exhaust system with brushed high level silencers
Final Drive : X ring chain
Swingarm : Twin-sided, aluminium
Rake : 26.9 º
Trail : 5.09 in (129.2 mm)
Fuel Consumption : 4.9 l/100 km (58 MPG)
CO2 Figures : 113.0 g/km
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

6781