American Flyer E-Wave 2.0 Standard vs Beta ekinder Race 16

Compare Specifications of American Flyer E-Wave 2.0 Standard and Beta ekinder Race 16

Selected Bikes

American Flyer E-Wave 2.0 Standard
American Flyer E-Wave 2.0 Standard

Brand:

Model:

Beta ekinder Race 16
Beta ekinder Race 16

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Electric Electric
Motor 500 watt Bafang Hub-drive motor 36V500W Brushless motor+ Sine wave controller
Load Carrying Capacity -- 70 Kg
Top Speed -- 29 kmph
Battery 10ah or 14ah battery 36V 5AH, removable high-power lithium battery
Charger -- 42V*3A
Display Digital --
Frame 6061 Post-Weld Heat Treated Alloy Frame Aluminum alloy
Stem Quill 30 degree 1 1/8" x25.4 Clamp --
Handle Bar 27" Alloy Cruiser Bend 25.4 Alloy
Fork Cro-Mo Suspension fork, adjustable, travel 40mm
Seatpost 27.2mm 15 degree Setback --
Grip -- APOLLO SOFTER grip
Crankset 170mm Alloy --
Pedals Wellgo Alloy Platform 9/16 --
Chain KMC X9- Nickel Plated --
Shifters Shimano Acera 9-Speed Trigger Shift --
Saddle Cruiser Saddle --
Hub Front -- Normal type, without bearing
Hub Rear Sealed Beating --
Spoke 12g HD Stainless Steel --
Bottom Bracket English Thread Sealed Cartridge-Cadence Sensing --
Tyres
Front Kenda Revolution 26x2.5 16“*2.5
Rear Kenda Revolution 26x2.5 16“*2.5
Wheel / RIM Rims: Double-Walled/ Eyelet Alloy MTB Wheelset Alloy spoked rim
Brakes
Front Tektro Hydraulic Disc mechanical disc brake
Rear Tektro Hydraulic Disc mechanical disc brake
Brake Lever Tektro E-Bike Hydraulic Brake --
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors Satin Black
Gloss Grey
Gloss Orange
Satin Army Green
--


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Overview
About The American Flyer E-Wave 2.0 Standard is a classic Southern California beach cruiser that come Read More --
Features - 500 watt Bafang Hub-drive motor
- Pedal-assist and throttle capabilities
- 10ah or 14ah battery
--
Additional Details Chainwheel: 50t
Rear Cogs: Shimano 9-Speed 11/36
Seat Binder: Alloy Quick-Release
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

9446