Benelli TRK 251 E5 vs Husqvarna FC 250 Rockstar Edition 2022

Compare Specifications of Benelli TRK 251 E5 and Husqvarna FC 250 Rockstar Edition 2022

Selected Bikes

Benelli TRK 251 E5
Benelli TRK 251 E5

Brand:

Model:

Husqvarna FC 250 Rockstar Edition 2022
Husqvarna FC 250 Rockstar Edition 2022

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 249.00 cc 249.90 cc
Engine Single cylinder, 4 stroke, liquid cooled, 4 valves per cylinder, double overhead camshaft 1-cylinder, 4-stroke engine
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Engine Lubrication Wet sump forced --
Clutch In oil bath DDS wet multi-disc clutch, Braktec hydraulics
Fuel System Electronic injection with 37 mm throttle body --
Maximum Power 25.8 HP @ 9250 RPM --
Maximum Torque 21.1 NM @ 8000 RPM --
Transmission -- 5-speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5
Battery -- Li-Ion 2.0 Ah battery
Display LCD display --
Frame Trellis in steel tubes 25CrMo4 steel central-tube frame
Handle Bar -- ProTaper handlebar
Chain -- 5/8 x 1/4"
Tyres
Front 110/70 R17 --
Rear 150/60 R17 --
Wheel / RIM Front Rim:17 "x MT 3.50" DOT, In aluminum alloy
Rear Rim: 17 "x MT 4.50" DOT, In aluminum alloy
Rims: Black D.I.D. DirtStar rims
Brakes
Front Single floating disc ø280 mm with 4-piston caliper and ABS 260 mm Disc brake
Rear -- 220 mm Disc brake
Suspension
Front Upside-down fork with Ø 41 mm stanchions
Front Suspension Travel:135mm
310 mm WP XACT-USD, Ø 48 mm
Rear T Swingarm with central shock absorber
Rear Shock Travel:60mm
300 mm WP XACT Monoshock with linkage
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length 2070 mm --
Width 840 mm --
Height 1300 mm --
Weight 176 kg 99.5 kg
Seat Height 800 940
Wheelbase 1390 mm --
Ground Clearance 170 mm 370 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 18 litres 7 litres
Overview
Features - BRAKING SYSTEM
- DIGITAL DISPLAY
- LARGE WINDSHIELD
New Quickshift function
Map switch
Additional Details CO2 EMISSIONS : 75 g / Km
EXHAUST SYSTEM : With catalyzed system and lambda probe
APPROVAL: Euro 5
CONSUMPTION: 3.2 l / 100km
EMS : Keihin EMS
Steering Head Angle: 63.9 °

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

6273