GasGas XC 200 2019 vs Lifan X-PECT 200 (LF200GY-4)

Compare Specifications of GasGas XC 200 2019 and Lifan X-PECT 200 (LF200GY-4)

Selected Bikes

GasGas XC 200 2019
GasGas XC 200 2019

Brand:

Model:

Lifan X-PECT 200 (LF200GY-4)
Lifan X-PECT 200 (LF200GY-4)

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 199.40 cc 196.90 cc
Engine 2-stroke Single-cylinder, liquid-cooled Vertical single Cylinder, Air Cooled, Four Stroke
Engine Starting Electric and Kick start Electric/Kick Start
Clutch Multidisc in oil bath. Rekluse system. Magura clutch pump Hand Clutched
Fuel System Carburettor Keihin PWK 38 mm --
Ignition Electronic – Euro4 --
Cooling System Liquid Cooled --
Maximum Power -- 16 Ps @ 8000 Rpm
Maximum Torque -- 13.8 Nm @ 6500 Rpm
Transmission 6 speed 5 Gears
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 --
Top Speed -- 100 kmph
Frame Center frame in chrome-moly-steelframe --
Tyres
Front 21 M/C 54R Michelin Enduro Medium F TT 90/90-19
Rear 18 70R Michelin Enduro Medium R TT 110/90-17
Wheel / RIM Spoke Spoke
Brakes
Front 260 mm NG disc, Nissin caliper Disc
Rear 220 mm NG disc, Nissin caliper Drum
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length 2145 mm 2060 mm
Width 810 mm 780 mm
Height 1235 mm 1130 mm
Weight 105 kg 130 kg
Seat Height -- 830
Wheelbase 1480 mm 1350 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 10 litres 10 litres
Overview
Features - Incorporation of new “Sun/Rain” double switch map.
- New optimized electric start system
- New electrical installation
- New system for mounting the display of the 28.6 mm diameter handlebar without central bar redesigned with a new steering position
- New Neken grips for firmer grip
- New GasGas brand central handlebar protector
- New redesigned handlebar supports to give greater rigidity to the handlebar mounting system
- New special graphic design for the 2019 EC / XC series
- New MY2019 graphic
- GasGas red frame protectors
- Re-designed side number panels and rear mudguard for a better fit of the parts, easier maintenance and filter cleaning
--
Additional Details -- Economical Fuel Consumption (L/100km) ≤ 2.3

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

5910