Gitane e-Kobalt 27.5 Yamaha vs Ridley E-Grifn

Compare Specifications of Gitane e-Kobalt 27.5 Yamaha and Ridley E-Grifn

Selected Bikes

Gitane e-Kobalt 27.5 Yamaha
Gitane e-Kobalt 27.5 Yamaha

Brand:

Model:

Ridley E-Grifn
Ridley E-Grifn

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Electric Electric
Motor Yamaha PW-TE, 60 Nm 4 sensors --
Range 85 to 170 km --
Charging Time -- 80 percent in 2 hrs
100 percent in 3.5 hrs
Battery Yamaha, semi-integrated, 500 Wh Mahle battery (350 Wh)
Display Yamaha Display A, LCD left --
Frame Aluminum 6061-T6, 27.5 ", Double butted, Boost, disc E-Grifn , Mahle X20, 350Wh , TA12x142 , Mudguard mounts , UDH , BB86 , Removable front derailleur clamp
Stem Aluminum, 31.6 x 350 mm (T.39-43) / 31.6 x 400 mm (T.47-50) Deda Super Box , 110 mm , Polish On Black
Handle Bar -- 4ZA Cirrus E.2 40/49 / St. BLA/16°
Fork Suntour XCR-34-Coil-Boost, hydraulic, 120 mm E-Grifn C 7E7/EGC01As
Seatpost -- Forza Aero , Zero Offset , 350mm
Crankset Aluminum, 38 teeth, 170 mm Shimano 105 , 50/34 , 172mm
Saddle TEC Fero, black Selle Italia Model X , Black
Derailleur Front Derailleur levers : Shimano Alivio, SL-M4000 9V Shimano 105
Derailleur Rear Shimano Alivio, RD-M4000-SGS Shimano 105 12sp
Hub Front Shimano MT-400, aluminum, Centerlock, 32T --
Cassette Shimano CS-HG201-9, 11-36 Shimano 105, 12s , 11-34
Tyres
Front TEC Saxum, 27.5 "x 2.35", Kevlar protection --
Rear TEC Saxum, 27.5 "x 2.35", Kevlar protection --
Wheel / RIM Rims : Mach1 CROSS-R, aluminum, 27.5 "584 x 23C Front - 4ZA Norte G F 28TL -X20- NO STI
Rear - 4ZA Norte G R 28TL -MAHLE X20- NO STI
Brakes
Front Shimano MT201, hydraulic, 180 / 160mm Flat Mount
Rear Shimano MT201, hydraulic, 180 / 160mm Flat Mount
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors Blue
Black
--


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Overview
Features -- --
Additional Details Sizes available : 39 43 47 50
Hanger : Aluminum, 720 x 20 x 31.8 x 6 °
Gallows : Aluminum, 75 x 31.8
Outer Tyre - Vittoria Zaffiro Pro , 700x32c , Foldable
Material - Carbon

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

7397