Bottecchia 116 Altus Disk 16S 29 vs Cannondale Quick 3

Compare Specifications of Bottecchia 116 Altus Disk 16S 29 and Cannondale Quick 3

Selected Bikes

Bottecchia 116 Altus Disk 16S 29
Bottecchia 116 Altus Disk 16S 29

Brand:

Model:

Cannondale Quick 3
Cannondale Quick 3

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Frame MTB 29 Alu 6061 DB IDF SmartForm C3 Alloy, SAVE, tapered head tube, Straightshot hidden cable routing, flat mount disc, rack/fender mounts, 360° reflectivity
Stem -- Cannondale 3 with Intellimount, Alloy, 31.8mm clamp
Handle Bar -- 6061 Alloy Double-butted, 25mm rise, 8° sweep, 6° rise, 640mm
Fork HL Raxe ALU 9.0 RLO remote hydraulic lock out Full carbon, 12x100mm thru-axle, 1-1/4" to 1-1/8" tapered steerer, flat mount disc, fender mounts, 360° reflectivity
Seatpost -- 6061 Alloy, 27.2x350mm
Grip -- Cannondale Ergo Fitness Dual Density, Lock-On
Crankset -- Prowheel, 48/32
Chain Chainweel : Shimano FC 42-34-24 KMC Z9, 9-speed
Shifters -- Shimano Altus, 9-speed
Saddle -- Cannondale Fitness Ergo Double Density
Headset -- FSA Sealed Bearing, integrated, 1-1/4"-1-1/8"
Derailleur Front -- Shimano Acera, 31.8mm clamp
Derailleur Rear -- Shimano Altus
Hub Front -- Alloy, Sealed, 12x100mm
Hub Rear -- Alloy, Sealed QR
Spoke -- Stainless Steel, 14g
Cassette -- Sunrace, 11-34, 9-speed
Bottom Bracket -- Cartridge, square taper
Tyres
Front CST/VRB 29 x 2,25 Schwalbe Spicer, 700x35c, K-Guard, reflective strip
Rear CST/VRB 29 x 2,25 Schwalbe Spicer, 700x35c, K-Guard, reflective strip
Wheel / RIM Raxe 29 Disk DB Cannondale Disc, double wall w/eyelet, 32h
Brakes
Front Shimano MT200 Disk Tektro HD-R280 hydraulic disc, 160 rotors
Rear Shimano MT200 Disk Tektro HD-R280 hydraulic disc, 140mm
Brake Lever -- Tektro hydraulic disc
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors c86 Antracite Opaco
c86 Matt Anthracite
Mercury


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Overview
Features -- --
Additional Details Change : Shimano Altus 16 s
Commands : Shimano SLM 310 24s
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1241