Canyon Commuter 9 Ltd vs Dawes Discovery Trail Low Step

Compare Specifications of Canyon Commuter 9 Ltd and Dawes Discovery Trail Low Step

Selected Bikes

Canyon Commuter 9 Ltd
Canyon Commuter 9 Ltd

Brand:

Model:

Dawes Discovery Trail Low Step
Dawes Discovery Trail Low Step

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Frame Canyon Commuter Design 20″ Low Step, Dawes 6061 alloy hybrid frame
Stem -- Quill Type, 80 mm extension , 40 Degree Rise
Handle Bar -- Dawes Riser Bar, 30 mm Rise, 6 degree back sweep, 620 mm wide
Fork Canyon F24 CF Disc Dawes Hi-Ten Unicrown Steel Straight Blades
Seatpost Canyon S25 VCLS 2.0 CF 27.2 mm x 350 mm
Grip Selle San Marco Canvas Comfort Grips, Double Density
Crankset Miranda Delta CDX 50T --
Pedals Iridium Premium Flat Pedal 9/16″
Chain Gates CDN Belt KMC Z-33
Shifters -- Shimano Revoshifter SL-RS35 3 x 6spd
Saddle Selle San Marco Regal Woven Dawes Custom Trekking Saddle
Headset Acros AiX-321 1 1/8″ Threaded
Derailleur Front -- Shimano Tourney FD-TZ31 3spd
Derailleur Rear -- Shimano Tourney RD-TZ50 6spd
Hub Front HUB SHIM Alfine SG-S7001-11 32H R 10x135 36H Nutted
Hub Rear HUB SHIM Alfine SG-S7001-11 32H R 10x135 36H Quick Release
Spoke -- 14G
Cassette Gates CDX 24T --
Chainrings -- Chainwheel : 170 mm Alloy Crank, 48-38-28T Chainrings
Bottom Bracket SRAM Pressfit GXP --
Taillamp Supernova E3 Tail Light --
Tyres
Front Schwalbe Kojak 35 mm 700 x 38C, Trekking Pattern
Rear Schwalbe Kojak 35 mm 700 x 38C, Trekking Pattern
Wheel / RIM Alexrims CRD30 | Shimano Alfine 11SH Double Wall Alloy, with CNC braking surface
Brakes
Front Magura MT thirty rear Alloy V-brakes, Linear Pull
Rear Magura MT thirty rear Alloy V-brakes, Linear Pull
Brake Lever -- Alloy lever
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight 12.32 kg 13.4 kg
Overview
Features -- --
Additional Details -- Bottom Bracket : 5pc with axle
Freewheel : Shimano 6spd 14-28T
Accessories -- Ping Bell
Single Plastic Chainguard

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

7068