CCM RAF Benevolent Fund Spitfire vs Triumph Trident 660 Triple Tribute Edition

Compare Specifications of CCM RAF Benevolent Fund Spitfire and Triumph Trident 660 Triple Tribute Edition

Selected Bikes

CCM RAF Benevolent Fund Spitfire
CCM RAF Benevolent Fund Spitfire

Brand:

Model:

Triumph Trident 660 Triple Tribute Edition
Triumph Trident 660 Triple Tribute Edition

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 600.00 cc 660.00 cc
Engine Single cylinder, Four-stroke Liquid-cooled, 12 valve, DOHC, inline 3-cylinder
Clutch Multiple-disc, wet, Hydraulic control Wet, multi-plate, slip and assist
Fuel System Injection: Mikuni D45 --
Cooling System Liquid --
Maximum Power 55 BHP 81 PS (60 kW) @ 10,250 rpm
Maximum Torque 58 NM @ 5500 RPM 64 Nm @ 6,250 rpm
Transmission 6 Speed 6 speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 --
Drivetrain -- Multipoint sequential electronic fuel injection with electronic throttle control
Display -- Multi-function instruments with colour TFT screen
Frame High strength steel, TIG welded Tubular steel perimeter frame
Fuel Economy
Overall Mileage 23.80 kmpl 22.2 kmpl
Tyres
Front MT90B16 Front Tyre 120/70R17
Rear 150/80B16 Rear Tyre 180/55R17
Wheel / RIM Spoke Front: Cast aluminium, 17 x 3.5 in
Rear: Cast aluminium, 17 x 5.5 in
Brakes
Front 320 mm Disc Nissin two-piston sliding calipers, twin 310mm discs, ABS
Rear 240 mm Disc Nissin single-piston sliding caliper, single 255mm disc, ABS
Suspension
Front 100 mm wheel travel. Adjustable Showa 41mm upside down separate function forks (SFF)
Rear 100 mm wheel travel. Adjustable Showa monoshock RSU, with preload adjustment
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length 2117 mm --
Height 1100 mm 1089 mm
Weight 135 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 189
Handlebar Width -- 795
Seat Height 760 805
Wheelbase 1423 mm 1401 mm
Ground Clearance 130 mm --
Fuel Tank Capacity 14 litres 14 litres
Overview
Features -- Triumph Trident 660 Triple Tribute Edition
Additional Details -- Rake: 24.6 degree
Trail: 107.3 mm

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

9072