CFMoto 450MT vs Fantic Caballero 500 Anniversary

Compare Specifications of CFMoto 450MT and Fantic Caballero 500 Anniversary

Selected Bikes

CFMoto 450MT
CFMoto 450MT

Brand:

Model:

Fantic Caballero 500 Anniversary
Fantic Caballero 500 Anniversary

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 449.50 cc 449.00 cc
Engine 2-cylinder, inline 4-stroke, liquid-cooled, DOHC, 270 degree crankshaft Single cylinder 4 stroke, liquid cooled , Single camshaft - 4 valve
Engine Starting -- Electric
Fuel System BOSCH EFI Electronic Fuel injection - throttle body ø 40mm
Cooling System -- Liquid cooled
Maximum Power 32.5 kW(44hp) @ 8500 rpm 40 HP @ 7500 RPM
Maximum Torque 44 Nm @ 6250 rpm 43 NM @ 6000 RPM
Transmission CF-SC slipper clutch, 6-speed, wet, multi-plate --
Frame Trellis Frame
Chrome-molybdenum Steel
--
Headlamp LED --
Tyres
Front 90/90 R21 CST 110/80 R19
Rear 140/70 R18 CST 140/80 R17
Wheel / RIM Front: 21" Wire-spoked rims (tubeless)
Rear: 18" Wire-spoked rims (tubeless)
Spoked with aluminum rims
Brakes
Front 320mm single disc, four-piston caliper, J.Juan Floating brake disc 320 mm
Rear 240mm single disc, single-piston caliper, J.Juan Floating brake disc 230mm
ABS BOSCH dual-channel ABS (rear ABS switchable) --
Suspension
Front -- Rebound damping regulation
Front suspension travel: 150mm
Rear -- Rebound damping regulation
Rear suspension travel: 150mm
Colors Available
Colors Zephyr Blue
Tundra Grey
--


Physical Specs
Length 2210 mm 2080 mm
Width 870 mm --
Height 1390 mm --
Weight 175 kg 150 kg
Seat Height 820 820
Wheelbase 1505 mm 1425 mm
Ground Clearance 220 mm --
Fuel Tank Capacity 17.5 litres `12 litres
Overview
About The CFMoto 450MT is an adventure-ready motorcycle with a 449cc engine, long-travel suspension, Read More --
Features - 18w USB Type-A & Type-C charging port
- BOSCH TCS
--
Additional Details -- Exhaust system : Dual exhaust by ARROW
Fuel consumption: 4,2 l/100 km
CO2 emission: 97 g/km
Swingarm: In steel with variable section and progressive link

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

2960