Kawasaki Ninja 125 Performance vs Motomel Skua 125 Xtreme

Compare Specifications of Kawasaki Ninja 125 Performance and Motomel Skua 125 Xtreme

Selected Bikes

Kawasaki Ninja 125 Performance
Kawasaki Ninja 125 Performance

Brand:

Model:

Motomel Skua 125 Xtreme
Motomel Skua 125 Xtreme

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 125.00 cc 124.00 cc
Engine Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke Single, DOHC, 4 valves Single cylinder 4T
Engine Starting Electric Electric and kick
Engine Lubrication Forced lubrication, wet sump --
Clutch Wet multi-disc Manual
Fuel System Fuel injection: Ø 28 mm x 1 --
Cooling System Liquid-cooled Air Cooled
Maximum Power 15 PS @ 10000 RPM 10.5 Hp @ 8000 RPM
Maximum Torque 11.7 NM @ 7700 RPM --
Load Carrying Capacity -- 150 kg
Transmission 6-speed 5 speeds
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1-N-2-3-4-5
Top Speed -- 85 kmph
Display -- Analogue
Frame Tubular diamond, steel --
Headlamp -- LED
Taillamp -- LED
Tyres
Front 100/80-17M/C 52S 70 / 100 - 19
Rear 130/70-17M/C 62S 90 / 100 - 16
Wheel / RIM Alloy Spoke
Brakes
Front Single 290 mm petal disc. Caliper: Dual piston Disc
Rear Single 220 mm petal disc. Caliper: Dual piston Disc
Suspension
Front 37 mm telescopic fork Hydraulic fork
Rear Uni-Trak, gas-charged shock with adjustable preload Monoshock
Colors Available
Colors Lime Green / Ebony (KRT Edition)
Metallic Flat Stardust White / Metallic Flat Spark Black
Metallic Spark Black / Metallic Flat Spark Black
Black
Red
White
Blue


Physical Specs
Length 1935 mm 2150 mm
Width 685 mm 770 mm
Height 1075 mm 1050 mm
Weight -- 115 kg
Seat Height 785 --
Wheelbase 1330 mm --
Ground Clearance 170 mm --
Fuel Tank Capacity 11 litres 7.5 litres
Overview
Features -- - New Front Optics
- New Dashboard
- Lobed Disc Front And Rear Brake
- Raised Fender
- Wide Seat With Non-Slip Upholstery And Double Texture.
Additional Details Final drive : Chain
Primary Reduction Ratio : 2.966 (86/29)
Gear Ratios 1st : 2.833 (34/12)
Gear Ratios 2nd : 1.875 (30/16)
Gear Ratios 3rd : 1.444 (26/18)
Gear Ratios 4th : 1.208 (29/24)
Gear Ratios 5th : 1.056 (19/18)
Gear Ratios 6th : 0.962 (25/26)
Final reduction ratio : 3.500 (56/16)
Trail : 90 mm
Wheel travel front : 110 mm
Wheel travel rear : 120 mm
Consumption 2.1 Lts

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

84