Kawasaki Vulcan S Cafe Tourer

Compare Specifications of Kawasaki Vulcan S Cafe Tourer. Complete selection by adding one more.

Selected Bikes

Kawasaki Vulcan S Cafe Tourer
Kawasaki Vulcan S Cafe Tourer

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol
Engine Displacement 649.00 cc
Engine Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke Parallel Twin,DOHC, 8 valves
Engine Starting Electric
Engine Lubrication Forced lubrication, semi‑dry sump
Clutch Wet multi-disc, manual
Fuel System Fuel injection: 38 mm x 2 with sub-throttles
Ignition Digital
Cooling System Liquid-cooled
Maximum Power 61 PS @ 7500 RPM
Maximum Torque 63 NM @ 6600 RPM
Transmission 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Frame Tubular diamond, high-tensile steel
Tyres
Front 120/70 R18M/C 59H
Rear 160/60 R17M/C 69H
Wheel / RIM Alloy
Brakes
Front Single 300 mm disc. Caliper: Dual-piston
Rear Single 250 mm disc. Caliper: Single-piston
Suspension
Front 41 mm telescopic fork
Rear Offset laydown single-shock, linkage equipped, with 7-way adjustable preload
Colors Available
Colors Candy Steel Furnace Orange / Metallic Spark Black


Physical Specs
Length 2310 mm
Width 880 mm
Height 1130 mm
Kerb Weight 231
Seat Height 705
Wheelbase 1575 mm
Ground Clearance 130 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 14 litres
Overview
Features - Easy-to-read instrumentation
- Relaxed, foot-forward riding position
- Linkage-equipped offset laydown single-shock
- Adjustable clutch/brake levers
Additional Details Trail : 120 mm
Wheel travel front : 130 mm
Wheel travel rear : 80 mm
Limited power version 35 kW
Power down kit 35 kW : Available
CO2 emission : 109 g/km
Fuel consumption 35 kW kit : 4.4 l/100 km
CO2 emission 35 kW kit : 106 g/km
Final drive Sealed chain
Primary Reduction Ratio 2.095 (88 / 42)
Gear Ratios 1st : 2.438 (39 / 16)
Gear Ratios 2nd : 1.714 (36 / 21)
Gear Ratios 3rd : 1.333 (32 / 24)
Gear Ratios 4th : 1.111 (30 / 27)
Gear Ratios 5th : 0.966 (28 / 29)
Gear Ratios 6th : 0.852 (23 / 27)
Final reduction ratio : 3.067 (46 / 15)

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

2119