Kestrel TERX SRAM Rival 1X vs Polygon Path F4

Compare Specifications of Kestrel TERX SRAM Rival 1X and Polygon Path F4

Selected Bikes

Kestrel TERX SRAM Rival 1X
Kestrel TERX SRAM Rival 1X

Brand:

Model:

Polygon Path F4
Polygon Path F4

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Frame Kestrel Super Light (KSL) 800K carbon fiber, FM Disc, BSA BB ALX Urban Fitness
Stem 3T ARX II, 6061 3D-forged alloy, 31.8 mm, +/- 6 Alloy, EXT: 60mm, BB: 31,8mm, R/D: 40mm
Handle Bar 3T Ergonova, 31.8 Alloy, W: 680mm, BB: 31,8mm, R/D: 0mm, B: 6 degree
Fork KSL full-carbon, 1 1/8" - 1 1/2" tapered steerer, Flat Mount Disc 12 mm TA, dual water bottle cage mounts Carbon Rigid
Seatpost -- Alloy Seatpost, DXL: 27,2 x 350mm
Crankset FSA Omega Adventure, 40T Prowheel 48T
Pedals -- One Piece PP Flat
Chain KMC X11-1 w/MissingLink KMC X10 FOR 10-Speed
Shifters SRAM Rival 1 Hydraulic Disc ShimanoTiagra Rapid Fire 10 Speed
Saddle Prologo Kappa RS, STN rails Polygon Saddle
Headset FSA integrated 1 1/8" top, 1 1/2" bottom FSA NO. 42 W/ Sealed Bearing
Derailleur Rear SRAM Rival 1 HRD Shimano Tiagra 10 Speed
Hub Front -- Alloy Disc Brake 12x100mm 24H
Hub Rear -- Alloy Disc Brake 12x142mm 32H CL For Sprocket
Spoke -- Front: Stainless 14G NDS:276 & DS:280
Rear: Stainless 14G NDS:278 & DS:278
Cassette SRAM PG-1130, 11-42T Shimano CS HG500-10
Bottom Bracket FSA BB386 EVO BSA Prowheel BB 68mm
Tyres
Front Donnelly X'Plor MSO, 700 x 36c, folding VEE G-Sport 700x35C 622x35
Rear Donnelly X'Plor MSO, 700 x 36c, folding VEE G-Sport 700x35C 622x35
Wheel / RIM Stans No Tubes Grail MK1, 32h Alloy Double Wall 24H
Brakes
Front Disc Tektro HD-M275 Hydraulic Disc, Tektro TR 160-24 160mm Rotor
Rear Disc Tektro HD-M275 Hydraulic Disc, Tektro TR 160-24 160mm Rotor
Brake Lever SRAM Rival 1 HRD TEKTRO HD-M275
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors Satin Graphite Blue/Black


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Overview
Features -- --
Additional Details Sizes : 46cm , 49cm, 52cm, 54cm, 56cm, 58cm, 61cm --

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

4055