Kross Hexagon 1.0 vs Orbea Terra H40

Compare Specifications of Kross Hexagon 1.0 and Orbea Terra H40

Selected Bikes

Kross Hexagon 1.0
Kross Hexagon 1.0

Brand:

Model:

Orbea Terra H40
Orbea Terra H40

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Speed 21 --
Frame -- Orbea Terra Hydro disc, hydroformed triple butted aluminium, HS 1,5", PF, Thru Axle 12mm x 142mm rear, thread M12x2 P1, DT internal cable routing, 27,2mm seat tube, MMS system
Stem ALUMINIUM 105 MM/31,8/7° OC Road Performance RP21, -6º
Handle Bar ALUMINIUM 660 MM 31.8 OC Gravel GR31-R, Rise 15, Reach 70, Drop 110
Fork KROSS Orbea Terra ICR, full carbon, 1-1/8" - 1,5" tappered head tube compatible, Thru axle 12x100mm, thread M12x2 P1
Seatpost -- SP 0.2 Carbon, 27SP 0.2 Carbon, 27.2mm, Setback 20
Grip HERRMANS --
Crankset WHEEL TOP Shimano GRX RX600-10 30x46t
Pedals FP-804 --
Chain YBN S50 KMC X10
Shifters SHIMANO RS36 REVOSHIFT Shimano ST-RX400
Saddle CROSS D5311 Prologo Akero AGX STN size 155mm
Headset FP-H863 O1-1/8" FSA 1-1/2" Integrated Aluminium Cup
Derailleur Front SHIMANO TOURNEY TZ500 Shimano GRX RX400
Derailleur Rear SHIMANO TOURNEY TX800 Shimano RD-RX400
Hub Front GL-B01R --
Hub Rear GL-B01F-QR --
Cassette SHIMANO MF TZ500 Shimano Tiagra HG-500 11-34t 10-Speed
Chainrings 42T-34T-24T / 170 MM --
Bottom Bracket FP-B902 --
Tyres
Front WANDA 26 X 2.1 Vittoria Terreno Dry Gravel 700x38c
Rear WANDA 26 X 2.1 Vittoria Terreno Dry Gravel 700x38c
Wheel / RIM KROSS Alloy, Tubeless, 700c, 21c
Brakes
Front V-BRAKE Shimano RX400 Hydraulic Disc
Rear V-BRAKE Shimano RX400 Hydraulic Disc
Brake Lever ALUMINIUM --
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors White / Black / Gray Glossy
Black / White / Red Matte
Black / White / Blue Glossy
Artichoke
Infinity Green
Blue Stone


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight 13.52 kg --
Overview
Features -- --
Additional Details Travel : 80 mm
Rear Shock : Lack
Rear Shock Absorber Travel : Lack
Freewheel Range : 14-28T
Saddle Bracket : ALUMINIUM 27,2 X 350
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

2356