KTM 125 XC 2025 vs Yamaha XSR125 Legacy

Compare Specifications of KTM 125 XC 2025 and Yamaha XSR125 Legacy

Selected Bikes

KTM 125 XC 2025
KTM 125 XC 2025

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha XSR125 Legacy
Yamaha XSR125 Legacy

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 124.80 cc 124.00 cc
Engine 1-cylinder, 2-stroke engine Liquid-cooled, OHC, 1-cylinder, 4-stroke
Engine Starting Electric starter Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Wet sump
Clutch Wet multi-disc DS clutch, Brembo hydraulics --
Fuel System -- Electronic fuel injection
Ignition -- Transistor
Cooling System -- Liquid-cooled
Maximum Power -- 15 PS @ 10,000 rpm
Maximum Torque -- 11.5 NM @ 8,000 rpm
Seating Capacity -- 2
Transmission 6-speed Sequential gearbox, 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Drivetrain -- Chain
Display -- Digital
Frame Central double-cradle-type 25CrMo4 steel Tubular bridge frame
Handle Bar Neken, aluminium Ø 28/22 mm --
Chain 520 X-Ring --
Headlamp -- LED
Taillamp -- LED
Tyres
Front -- 110/70-17
Rear -- 140/70-17
Wheel / RIM Spoked wheels with aluminium rims Alloy
Brakes
Front Disc brake - 260 mm Hydraulic disc brake, Ø 267 mm
Rear Disc brake - 220 mm Hydraulic disc brake, Ø 220 mm
Suspension
Front WP XACT cartridge Ø 48 mm Upside down fork, Ø 37 mm
130mm
Rear WP XACT Monoshock with linkage Swingarm
110mm
Colors Available
Colors -- Historic Black


Physical Specs
Length -- 1960 mm
Width -- 800 mm
Height -- 1065 mm
Weight 94.8 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 140
Seat Height 954 815
Wheelbase 1493 mm 1330 mm
Ground Clearance 359 mm 160 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 9 litres 11 litres
Overview
Features -- - Traditional style with sports performance
- Lightweight spoked wheels with gold rims
- High-performance sports tires
- 2-piece aluminum muffler cover
- Attractive colors and graphics
- First-class 125 cm³ engine with 11 kW (15 hp)
- 37 mm strong upside-down telescopic fork
- High-strength and lightweight Deltabox frame
- Stylish LED lighting
- Premium Features
Additional Details -- Fuel consumption: 2.1 litres/100 km
CO2 emission: 47g/km
Steering head angle: 26º
Trailing: 95mm

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1850