Leebike LEEW1720-1 vs Marin 2024 Sausalito E2

Compare Specifications of Leebike LEEW1720-1 and Marin 2024 Sausalito E2

Selected Bikes

Leebike LEEW1720-1
Leebike LEEW1720-1

Brand:

Model:

Marin 2024 Sausalito E2
Marin 2024 Sausalito E2

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Electric Electric
Motor 36V 250W Brushless high-speed motor Shimano Steps EP6 Drive Unit, 250W, 85Nm, Class 1 (16mph, 25Km/h)
Range 100 km 25-87 miles/40-140km
Charging Time -- 4 Hours
Load Carrying Capacity Max Load : 75 kg
Loading Qty : 224pcs/40HQ
--
Top Speed 25 kmph --
Battery 36V 10.4Ah Samsung 2600mAh Shimano BTEN605, 504Wh
Controller 36V 15A brushless controller --
Display LCD --
Frame 6061 Alloy aluminum Series 3 Butted and Formed 6061 Aluminum, 650B Wheel, Forged Motor Mount, Hydroformed Downtube Battery Mount, Integrated Wiring, Internal Housing, Kickstand, Rack, and Fender Mounts
Stem -- Marin Alloy
Handle Bar -- Marin Mini Riser Alloy
Fork V brake SR/Suntour NVX-E, 63mm Travel, Disc Specific
Seatpost -- Marin Alloy, 30.9mm
Grip -- Marin County
Crankset -- Forged Aluminum w/ 44T Steel Chairing
Pedals -- Nylon Platform
Chain -- KMC E11S
Gear Single --
Saddle -- Marin City Plush
Headset -- FSA No. 57E
Derailleur Rear -- Shimano Deore 11-Speed
Hub Front -- Forged Alloy, Disc Specific, 32H
Hub Rear -- Forged Alloy, Disc Specific, 32H
Spoke Stainless steel spoke --
Cassette -- Shimano Deore 11-Speed 11-51T
Stand -- Rear Mount Alloy
Tyres
Front 26"*1.95 /JIANDA WTB Horizon, 650Bx47, Wire Bead
Rear 26"*1.95 /JIANDA WTB Horizon, 650Bx47, Wire Bead
Wheel / RIM Aluminum circle Marin Aluminum Double Wall, Disc Specific
Brakes
Front V brake Shimano MT201 Hydraulic Disc, 180mm Rotor
Rear V brake Shimano MT201 Hydraulic Disc, 180mm Rotor
Brake Lever -- Shimano MT201 Hydraulic
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight 23 kg --
Overview
Features -- --
Additional Details Pakage size : 1440*255*780 mm
Chain wheel : Z51,KMC
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

5883