Mutt DRK-01 125 vs Suzuki GSX-S125

Compare Specifications of Mutt DRK-01 125 and Suzuki GSX-S125

Selected Bikes

Mutt DRK-01 125
Mutt DRK-01 125

Brand:

Model:

Suzuki GSX-S125
Suzuki GSX-S125

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 125.00 cc 124.40 cc
Engine 4-Stroke Single Cylinder Liquid-cooled DOHC 4-stroke, 1-cylinder, liquid-cooled, DOHC
Engine Starting -- Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Wet sump
Fuel System -- Fuel Injection
Ignition -- Electronic ignition
Cooling System Liquid-Cooled Liquid-cooled
Maximum Power 13.5 PS @ 10,000 rpm (10KW) 15 PS @ 10500 RPM
Maximum Torque 11NM @ 7,500 rpm 11.00 NM @ 8500 RPM
Load Carrying Capacity 180 Kg --
Seating Capacity -- 2
Transmission -- 6-speed, constant mesh
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Drivetrain -- Chain
Display -- Digital
Headlamp LED LED
Taillamp LED --
Fuel Economy
Overall Mileage -- 50 kmpl
Tyres
Front -- 90/80-17M/C
Rear -- 130/70-17M/C
Wheel / RIM Custom 18 Inch Saw-Tooth Rims Alloy
Brakes
Front Single hydraulic caliper, four pistons dia 25 mm, Floating single disc, dia 320mm Disc (Petal)
Rear Single hydraulic caliper, twin-pistons dia 25 mm Floating single disc, dia 240mm Disc (Petal)
Suspension
Front Upside-down telescopic fork dia 51 mm / dia 37 mm Telescopic, coil spring, oil damped
Rear Twin Piggyback Reservoir with adjustable preload Link type, coil spring, oil damped
Colors Available
Colors -- Metallic Triton Blue / Titan Black (BGY)
Titan Black (YVU)
Pearl Brilliant White / Titan Black (GHY)


Physical Specs
Length 2041 mm 2000 mm
Width 791 mm 745 mm
Height 1094 mm 1035 mm
Kerb Weight -- 135
Seat Height 795 785
Wheelbase 1364 mm 1300 mm
Ground Clearance -- 165 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 16 litres 11 litres
Overview
Features -- - Styled For The Streets
- Led Lighting
- Lcd Instruments
- Shutter-Key Lock System
- Suzuki Easy Start System.
- Responsive Chassis
- Lightweight Abs
- Light Aluminium Wheels
- Sporty Engine
- High Horsepower And Generous Torque
- Advanced Electronic Fuel Injection
Additional Details -- CO2: 55g/km

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

181